902
Facebook (feddit.org)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 57 points 4 days ago

I get pictures of my friends’ pets and food. Oh boy. And, of course, mountains and mountains of ads and right wing propaganda. So, mostly nazis, but sometimes kittens.

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 16 points 4 days ago

And, very very rarely…nazi kittens

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Do we have kitler community here?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 days ago

I get the privilege of personalized ads that try to get my dopamine going by playing into my psyche.

Wait, I just described drugs.

A drug that keeps changing to give me the best high.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago

Truly utopian, finally a drug to rule them all.

[-] hate2bme@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Heroin is so much better.

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 36 points 4 days ago

If the product is free, the user is the product

[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

No, the adverts are the product.

This whole notion that nothing can be free needs to get in the bin.

Linux is free. Who's selling the user data for that?

Lemmy is free, who's the product there?

Yes, Facebook/Meta is a shady fucking company and they are indeed selling your data on top of the ads they sell, but don't lump everything free into the same bucket.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 42 points 4 days ago

Wait... I'm not paying for Lemmy...

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 43 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Then who tf have I been paying $3.50 a month to for Lemmy Prime+?

[-] Skates@feddit.nl 11 points 4 days ago

Goddamn Loch Ness Monster. Stop asking people for money for lemmy+, folks came here to look at nature, not get pestered with your subscription model!

[-] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 8 points 3 days ago

You're not paying but someone is. The servers aren't running for free.

[-] wischi@programming.dev 10 points 4 days ago

Also not paying for LibreOffice, Linux and Gimp.

[-] deus@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I don't think this applies to non-profit stuff

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 days ago
[-] Afghaniscran@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago

It's taking your milk for dairy product replacements

[-] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

If y'all still have gmails, take a look at proton mail.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee 14 points 3 days ago

You get to use it for free instead of paying $20 a month.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago

Which is ironic because if they mixed to a subscription no one would use it

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 13 points 4 days ago

Rails against social media.

Proceeds to put a bunch of fucking hashtags.

[-] anas@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago

Criticizes society.

Is a member of society.

[-] nepenthes@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

I never seriously used Twitter, but aren't hashtags for indexing and search? Kinda need them there unless you enjoy screaming into the abyss, no?

[-] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I am guessing it's Mastodon. They have mastadon in their username and have a domain behind it.

It's Lemmy but for Twitter.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep, and Https://infosec.exchange instance

Edit: link to the toot (or whatever they're called in Mastodon): https://infosec.exchange/@Em0nM4stodon/113136555818743388

[-] x00za@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago

I'm old enough to just keep calling everything a post.

[-] spamfajitas@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

I mean, there is still kind of a point being made with respect to monetization of social media... something which is insanely controversial on Mastodon.

Bring up something more minor like showing ads to cover server costs and it's like tossing a grenade in and shutting the door.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 14 points 4 days ago

Same as TV has done for 70 years and radio for a 100.

You get entertainment, the company sells your attention. If you don't like it you don't use it.

Exactly the same model as reddit as well, with the addition of useless internet points in exchange of content to fuel the entertainment.

[-] nieminen@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

This isn't exactly corollary.

FB isn't just selling ad space, they're literally selling user data, often to adversarial countries.

Radio could never do that, and tv only could if you had a paid service like cable or satellite.

[-] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Yep, even if the amount of data harvested wasn't on the same level as TV, advertising still brings in money.

[-] Zementid@feddit.nl 7 points 3 days ago

Llama enabled open source Llm. And I actually like my Quest VR with Sidequest.

It's like; there are some raisins in the Shitcake.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 12 points 4 days ago

I used to have a Facebook account... I'm not even sure how many ago it was that I left it behind:-P.

[-] kyub@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago

Technically, everyone has a Facebook account, or at least a shadow account at Meta. Since they are one of the biggest data gatherers in the world, they gather data from all sorts of sources about people, not just from your active usage of their apps, sites and services. It's extremely likely that they have quite a bit of data on everyone. Many proprietary mobile apps, for example, initiate connections and transfer some data to Meta or Google. Even apps that have nothing at all to do with them otherwise. Many websites do. Many applications and games do. Integrated proprietary software in various devices, e.g. smart TVs, does. Also, WhatsApp is used by I think ~30% of the world's population now(?) and they started syncing/sharing all that data (mostly metadata but metadata is also very revealing) with Meta several years ago. Since WhatsApp also shares your whole contact / address book with Meta, they also effectively have a (mostly) full social connections graph on about a third of the world's population, based on WhatsApp usage data alone... so overall they'll have even more.

Unless you're efficiently blocking or otherwise interrupting all of those connections, on every device, or are able to really effectively use different IPs and never reveal all of the IP addresses associated with yourself, it's likely they still have quite a bit about you. If you're logged into a personally identifiable Google or Meta account on your phone, for example, and your phone is in your WiFi, then it'll have the same public-facing IP address as your computers, meaning they'll be able to enumerate all of your devices based on what they gathered on that IP address alone. It means that IP address can now always be linked to your person for Google/Meta/and so on.

And then there's always the possibility of the apps or websites not making your device directly connect to Meta/Google/... so it looks like only the 1st party gets your data (which always seems OK), but afterwards or in the backend it can still transmit or share the gathered data without your knowledge to those companies. This can also happen without the 1st party noticing it, because Meta and Google are often integrated in a lot of things, for example in SDKs or popular libraries. For example if you develop a mobile app using Meta's SDK, then by default (opt-out) the resulting app will transmit various kinds of telemetry data to Meta. Unless the developer disables this consciously, which many do not know or care about, it will simply be on and active. Sometimes they also have special data sharing deals with certain companies. Google has even more ways of being included in all sorts of things, they are almost omnipresent. For example Google is doing checks whether your Android-based mobile phone is carrier-locked or not, on behalf of your carrier, not your carrier. Google also receives your (personally-identifiable) IMEI and telephone number alongside every single location request your phone is doing, even from an app that's completely unrelated to Google. [unless your Android has configured a non-standard SUPL server, which isn't even an option in most Androids, or you use GrapheneOS which uses a proxy SUPL server to strip that bit of personally identifiable data before redirecting it to the real SUPL server (which most likely is your provider's, which in turn is most likely just a redirect to Google's SUPL server in the end)]. These are just examples off the top of my head, there's even more weird stuff happening of course.

So it doesn't really matter if you have active accounts at those companies, or not. They still know a lot about you and your devices, and sell that data to governments and whoever else bids the most for it. And even if they don't know you yet (if no link to your person is currently possible for a particular data set), which is highly unlikely but may be a possibility if you're truly careful and use different IPs all the time, they still gather all these records, and it only takes one single mistake on your end and they'll be able to link all records they gathered from that particular IP address to your person as well. Not only that, but they could even statistically calculate that based on what you visited or what you wrote somewhere online, or even how your typing style is, that you're likely this particular person, even if the data is still "anonymous".

It's really hard and really inconvenient to escape all the data gathering, in practice the only thing you can do is minimize it. Most users don't care at all or don't want to deal with the extra effort and simply let everything flow out. It's a much easier online life, but it's also an almost fully surveilled online life.

[-] OpenStars@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

img

Every breath you take, every move you make, every bond you break, every step you take, I'll be watching you...

Can't you see, you belong to me? My poor heart aches with every step you take!

- The Police

So it's not even "our" data at all, see...? (/s, or rather in the Machiavellian sense, that so long as people with power are willing to ~~eat~~ "own" us, then they have that right - same as Russia owns Ukraine and Israel owns Gaza, etc.)

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I still have one for Marketplace, but there's been no activity for 8 years. Apparently people still said happy birthday to me up to 2021.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yegambit@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

Seems like this kinda post keeps on being published like we’re all suddenly understanding how the world works

[-] Geometrinen_Gepardi@sopuli.xyz 10 points 4 days ago

Isn't the profit a few dozen dollars per user per year?

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

You are right. Rounding numbers for ease.

$134B income in 2023. 3 billion active users per month

134 ÷ 12 ÷ 3 roughly comes out to $3.7/user/month

https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2024/Meta-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2023-Results-Initiates-Quarterly-Dividend/default.aspx

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago

So, damn, they could offer a "leave me the fuck alone" subscription for $5/m and nearly double their income from those users.

Kinda makes you wonder why they don't... I guess it kinda looks like extortion

[-] cron@feddit.org 16 points 4 days ago

They want 10€ from EU citizens to not show ads, but it is doubtful that this is legal.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

From memory, after a few drinks, the EU wasn't happy with their option of Pay Us or accept full tracking and advertising.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

A more comprehensive analysis would show that this is how much Facebook itself makes in profits from selling personal data, not how much total money and influence that personal data is leveraged for across the various entities that purchase access, influence, and/or advertising from it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2024
902 points (98.7% liked)

Microblog Memes

5393 readers
3659 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS