530
submitted 1 month ago by vegeta@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 177 points 1 month ago

Remember folks: if we do our job right, this traitor asshole will die in prison.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

Hell, I'm still holding out for his heart to explode during one of his Klan rallies.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago

Po-TAY-to, Po-TAH-to.

Either. Both!

[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

You misspelled firing squad.

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Firing squads have some guns that are loaded as blanks so nobody is really sure who fired the fatal shot, and in the case of Trump I think this is unfair to the people firing the guns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 16 points 1 month ago

Even if he lose, he will never see inside of a prison, that's unfortunately not how the "justice" works.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

If Merchan was planning on giving him a slap on the wrist then there would've been no point in delaying the sentencing.

[-] match@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago

i consider exile in Russia to be a type of prison

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago

Anyone wanna tell him that the only reason she endorsed anyone in the first place is because Trump couldn't keep his big mouth shut? Had he not made a bunch of posts implying that Swift endorsed him, she probably would have stayed out of it.

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago

She endorsed Biden before. It wasn't really a surprise.

[-] WaxedWookie@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Yeah - his campaign producing deepfaked support from her when she was busy keeping her views to herself couldn't have motivated her to correct the record. This is just the personal stuff - the ways in which his policy positions and rhetoric negatively affect her and her fans is endless.

Trump fucked around with one of the few women he has reason to respect (by his framework) - she's beautiful and wealthier than him. Now he's finding out, and holy shit is he sore about it.

[-] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Trump, you're the moron that everyone already knew you were.

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 72 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A formal declaration of war, and the battle with the Swifties has been engaged.

edit: another epic rant may be starting:

Unrealized tax on capital gains? That wording would mean the tax on capital gains is unrealized, not a Tax on Unrealized capital gains you stable business genius

Reverse Deportation? So you want to stop deportation and/or import people? JFC

If they are failing, seems like they would becoming less of/not a threat?

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 42 points 1 month ago

Hey, he's reversing the deportations!

[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago

Breaking: Trump Encourages Illegal Immigration! As seen on the internet!

[-] eatthecake@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Trump discourages legal migration! Said on TV!

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Someone should show Trump Nextdoor. He’d fucking love that app.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

He is that app

[-] FunkyElectro@pawb.social 16 points 1 month ago

He's telling the rich to fear another great depression as if the rich didn't make fucking bank during the actual great depression.

[-] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

Also... the rich were the caused the great depression.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 63 points 1 month ago

Compared to Trump, Taylor Swift has a lot more star power. I think he's realized that she could easily grab him by the pussy.

[-] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 54 points 1 month ago

he tweets it, others reblog it. are you seeing how this works for him, yet? won't matter. the dopamine hit in getting upvotes for the monster who throws the dead cat on the table outweigh any logical argument on how mockery is precisely what trump and vance want, it takes energy, energy which would otherwise go to praising harris and waltz. he knows he can push them below the fold at any point, including coming off a decisive loss during the debate, and swifts endorsement, all anyone's talked about for 4 days are hatiians in springfield ohio, and that is how internet mockery helps him. this is not new news. yet people can't stop. and trump depends on that. it's all he has.

he posts hateful incendiary fabricated bullshit, and all the ants dance, holding him above the fold, the first story on the nightly news

[-] bacon_saber@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, seems like too few words for an actual rant. Smoke bomb to distract from his ridiculous debate and to get that out of the news cycle

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] draneceusrex@lemmy.world 51 points 1 month ago

I still think it's funny that this is being treated as a full-blown endorsement. She said she is voting for Harris, then encouraged people to be politically informed and to vote...

Oh...maybe Republicans don't want people to be politically informed or to vote...

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago

How is it not a full blown endorsement? She has publicly stated that she is voting for her, and gave a host of reasons why. Quite literally and explicitly an endorsement. What more needs to be done for it to be a full endorsement? Does she need to say "don't think and vote like I say"? Because that's what it sounds like you are saying that by telling people to get informed, that makes this less of an endorsement.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 month ago

bruh, do you want to get a song written about you? Because this is how you get a song written about you. The song will go on looooong after you’re dead. tread lightly.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago

The irony is that Trump forced Swift to speak up after the fake AI endorsement. Swift would have remained publicly neutral.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 19 points 1 month ago
[-] Taleya@aussie.zone 16 points 1 month ago

Holy crap someone on tumblr legit predicted this

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 16 points 1 month ago

Wasn't he just posting memes of her two weeks ago? lol. He's jilted.

[-] grumpo_potamus@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I hate Mondays --Garfield

I hate hate --Reagan Youth

We hate Donald Trump --Millions of American voters

[-] DrSleepless@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I hate America - Ronald Reagan

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

What he really wanted to say was: "I am envious of Taylor Swift!"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

If Trump wants to find out if Swift can rhyme "orange" then he should absolutely keep attacking her. I'm pretty sure there's gotta be like three people in the world you could figure it out legitimately, and she could be one of them. Or she could afford to hire someone who could.

[-] d00phy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Soon: new Taylor Swift / Eminem single drops

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] arin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

That's one way to lose voters for one side lmfao

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Grampa Ranty is having a rough morning

[-] NounsAndWords@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago
[-] flicker@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

I just realized that there was a Phantom Space Man. It was Red Death!

He just didn't stay on the space station...

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
530 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4510 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS