this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
71 points (97.3% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26916 readers
1586 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Was thinking of this after a conversation I had on a thread about dreams. Someone joked “I was dreaming of the events of The Matrix, then I was woken up by someone worried my dream was infringing the Wachowski’s copyrights”, and it turned into a whole train of thought in my mind, like violating IP law because you stole fire from Zeus which was his intellectual property.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Parents have to pay a fee for the firstname they give their kids. Popular firstnames cost more, gross ones cost less.

The kids themselves have to pay again for it monthly, their whole live long.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This might be the only valid reason to ever name a kid "Jayrahmyie"

[–] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Now everyone is going for this and they're gonna charge more WHAT HAVE YOU DONE

[–] androogee@midwest.social 0 points 2 months ago

Made themself a mint, that's what.

[–] LouNeko@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Nah it should be like fetishes, the more obscure the more expensive. But you can get John or Mark for free.

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Some squatter who bought the rights to it for two twigs and a raspberry back when they were first selling off name rights 200,000 years ago

[–] IIII@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Royalties every time you use a line from a Disney musical in spoken conversation

[–] silentdon@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] palordrolap@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago

Rest assured that they've already had that idea a dozen times already, and if they thought they could make it stick, they would have done so by now.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You must never go there.

[–] ZealotOfLuna@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Lineages could claim copyright of children and their works as derivative. Entire families could claim copyright of their descendants and all works related. Each new generation resets the timer on expiration if the copyright expirations still apply.

[–] j4k3@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Discovery of oxygen.

Stop breathing my proprietary gas!

My time zones! Not yours!

My special ï makes all i's mine or I'll sue you into bankrupt poverty.

I own slurred accent (n + 1) and anyone speaking in said accent must cease and desist

[–] Boozilla@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Didn't Nestle want to do this with water?

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Planetary air is free as no one could prove in court that they had any hand in its design or creation.

However the air in contained facility such as a space station or mars habitat is copy protected. Each inhabitant requires a Microsoft 365 style license renewed annually to breathe. Special areas of the habitat or use cases such as atheltic activities require special temporary licenses.

Hmmm Brb: writing synopsis.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's basically a plot point in Heinlein's The Cat Who Walks Through Walls, where visitors have to pay for the amount of air they intend to breathe while visiting the moon.

Also, Idea: invent a copyrightable method of filtering or otherwise treating air. Release your "specially modified" air into the atmosphere. Start charging for every time someone inhales one of your AyreMolecuulz™.

[–] fraksken@infosec.pub 14 points 2 months ago

Paying money every time you sit on a chair. Part goes to the owner, part goes to taxes, part goes to the chair maker's company, part goes to the chair desiger, a drip goes to the chair maker.

[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Propietary ownership of bacteria that allow fermentation

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 8 points 2 months ago

I would be surprised if this isn't already a thing

[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 7 points 1 month ago

Getting sued for sitting down to poop in a similar position as done in some movie

[–] hornface@fedia.io 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think current copyright rules are already quite wild enough when applied to digital media, since digital media is literally just made of numbers. Anyone who makes IP automatically owns the number that represents it in a computer.

Plus it's not just that one number. What if you have different resolutions of an image or video? Different file formats or encodings? What if you compress or encrypt the media? Yeah, the copyright holder can enforce that nobody is allowed to use ANY of those numbers. What if you take media and divide it by 2? Probably still copyrighted. What if you divide it by 236832746589? Copyrighted? Probably, yeah, since it would be too easy to take a movie, divide it by that number, and give it to all your friends so they could reproduce the original. I don't even know how to estimate the extremely vast amount of numbers somebody implicitly owns every time they make any piece of IP.

So yeah, literally illegal to count high enough or perform certain forbidden math.

[–] thirteene@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I actually think this backfires on most of you. Copyright law makes everything public domain after a period of time, Johnny Fires kids will be able to trade for all the first professionals in the world. But Life +70 years after currency is invented, anyone can print cash and trade falls apart and services and materials are the only thing if value. Copyright laws broken :shrug:

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world -2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

LOL copyright law isn't the only law that says you can't print your own money

[–] androogee@midwest.social 4 points 2 months ago

Damn, if only someone had asked a hypothetical question wherein copyright law controls everything.

Oh well, that'll never happen.

Good thing you were here to rectify such a foolish mistake.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Memes taken down and replies deleted in conversations because they contain copyrighted text and images. Lyrics censored in online conversation. All video containing any image with a logo protected by trademark, or characters protected by international copyright, even when on T shirts and signs being taken down.

[–] Eiri@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

When you're born, Pantone checks your skin color and charges you. You need to get a license before you get tanned or they fine you.

[–] Infynis@midwest.social 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It would be pretty funny if airplane manufacturers trademarked their con-trails, so each type of plain left a different trail behind

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If they were all a different color, that'd be pretty damn cool.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Chemtrail conspiracy theorists in absolute shambles.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

Think of the TikTok grifting!

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Sexual positions are locked behind tiered paywalls. The most basic ones are free, but as they get more interesting, you have to pay increasing royalty fees.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Ownership of specific light spectrums would be fucked up

[–] hmonkey@lemy.lol 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

I think Anish Kapoor owns Vantablack if that counts. Technically he probably just owns the right to the paint

[–] mangaskahn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

He doesn't own it. He has an exclusive license to use it in art. Surrey NanoSystems Limited owns the patent on VantaBlack. Stuart Semple was so angry that Kapoor received that license that he had a blacker black material created and licensed it to anyone but Kapoor. When Kapoor obtained a sample anyway, Semple had a still blacker material created, to spite him.

https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/shortcuts/2019/aug/05/black-30-anish-kapoor-and-the-art-worlds-pettiest-funniest-dispute

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As much as I dislike Kapoor, technically Vantablack isn't a pigment or regular paint by any means. From my understanding it is actually carbon nano tubes with who knows what else mixed in it and I believe it's actually very dangerous to be around without proper PPE. So in that sense, it makes sense to me that he "owns" it.

Still don't like the guy though.

[–] FatCrab@lemmy.one 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If it's patented, you can just read the patent to know what else is in it.

[–] SynonymousStoat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I could, but I don't personally care that much about Vantablack.

There is a group (person) that makes an actual super deep black paint called Black 4.0 and if memory serves correctly they actually started with a jab at Kapoor by originally making the Pinkest Pink paint and banned Kapoor from buying it. Looks like they have a lot of different paints these days and are definitely worth checking out.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They do it with radio spectrums.

They literally auction that shit off.

[–] lazylion_ca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Masseurs having to document and pay royality for every massage technique used.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Sneezing and breathing in different ways like hyperventilation.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

My comment on this thread isn’t visible when J view the thread itself. It’s visible if I access it through my own comment history.

Does anyone know why that might be? I’m using the Voyager client for ios.

Can y’all see a comment I made, top level, in this thread, other than this one?

[–] stonerboner@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 2 months ago

You can’t skeet on my ex, I trademarked that ass ;)