this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
1539 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59329 readers
4634 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It’s about time that Intuit was called out for their scam. Hopefully, the attempt to stop the federal tax filing will get dismissed as well.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 252 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Fuck Intuit and H&R Block, all my homies use FreeTaxUSA.

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A (now ex) coworker turned me on to FreeTaxUSA like a decade ago and I've been using it every year since then. It's easy, free (for federal) and just works. I usually pay the $15 for them to file state/school since I'm a lazy fuck but really, my time is worth something after all. I've had zero complaints with them.

[–] EnglishMobster@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

FWIW, CashApp Taxes (formerly Credit Karma Taxes) is free for state and federal.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Formerly Credit Karma taxes because Credit Karma was bought by Intuit, believe it or not, and they had to spin off the tax prep part.

[–] bakachu@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Huh I did not know this. CK was my backup to FT USA but that is indeed some sneaky shit. I'm scared now for FT USA - PLEASE DO NOT SELL OUT.

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I used Credit Karma taxes for several years and have actually used the Cash app Taxes for the last two years since the switch and while it's not quite as good as it was under the CK umbrella it's still been mostly okay for me.

[–] Humanoid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

It also works smooth with state taxes! I used to have to manually fill out a pdf and attach for the state portion of the return with other software.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago

My wife and I have slightly complex taxes. We pay a local independent tax preparer to do it for us. I’d much rather my money go to a hard working neighbor than a scam-baiting company like intuit.

[–] hypnotoad__@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

They're cheap, straightforward, and not Intuit. Enough said.

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

FTUSA is amazing. It's either free or super cheap, depending on your state and income. I wish I knew about them sooner. I did my taxes on my phone at work during a slow shift.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have used FreeTaxUSA. One year FreeTaxUSA was giving me a pretty low return number, so I went with TurboTax instead. I agree FreeTaxUSA is cheaper, but make sure you cross compare to ensure you aren’t leaving money on the table.

At this point though, my taxes are so complicated, I just hire a professional.

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is absolutely wild that it's so bad over there, that you're gushing over a service that should just be provided by the government in the first place (and is, in most developed countries)

[–] Gray@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

For context, the reason I'm hating on Intuit and H&R Block and encouraging people to use FreeTaxUSA is because the first two are the main culprits behind the extensive lobbying that has led to the US government continuing to require people to file their own taxes rather than modernizing and making this process free and easy. My "gushing" is in pursuit of changing the broken system you're pointing out.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 156 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I love how it's gone so far beyond "We would like to assist people in paying their taxes."

"We would like to prevent the US government from examining the possibility of creating it's own online tax filing portal."

"We would like to advertise our product as free using government channels and grants only to then turn around after the user has input their most sensitive data into our database and attempt to wring them for $100.00 or not be bound by our privacy policy."

[–] solstice@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Feels like every Evil Corporation (tm) has gone this route. In ye olden days it used to be a competitive market where businesses tried to provide the best product and services for the best prices. Then at some point everyone collectively decided to start doing as little as possible without getting sued. I'm so sick of it.

Regarding tax compliance for individuals, if you have the slightest complications in your financial situation, it might be best to pay a small time preparer $500 to deal with the hassle. Software isn't cheap these days so might as well pay a small premium for the better service a pro provides. (Disclaimer: I am a pro so my opinion is biased.)

[–] bakachu@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Agree, would rather my money went to a local firm with an actual person who I can consistently contact for questions. Did this a few years ago for an especially challenging tax year. Absolutely 0 regrets - if I had done it via self-serve software I would've missed out on quite a few unknown tax assists that the accountant found.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 126 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every time you see a post like this, remember that one of your elected officials lined their pockets to fuck the entire country for generations ahead

[–] grayman@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You left out the best part... The amount is often extremely low. Just a few grand to the old PAC that directly feeds their campaign which is just a slush fund for their personal use.

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

When you're the kind of person to do this, the number doesn't matter. It's the fact that you will get away with it

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 year ago

Why wouldn't they when they can do it without any fear of retribution? The worst they get is some angry comments from internet randoms.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 108 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In sane countries, the revenue service calculates your taxes for you and sends you a bill.

[–] Nefrayu@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

In Ireland and I believe most other European countries the tax is just taken out of your salary/wage by your employer and sent to Revenue. So unless you do something taxable outside of a normal wage you largely don’t need to worry about it.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is in the U.S. too, but you often either owe more than was taken out or are due a refund because too much was taken out. But you need tax software in order to figure that out because it's so damn complicated half the time.

[–] Nefrayu@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Oh that sounds somehow more annoying than just having to pay it yourself, seeing as you have to do the calculations yourself anyway.

To be fair it possible to be owed a refund or owe extra tax in Ireland too. If you changed jobs and didn’t inform Revenue they won’t apply tax credits until they know the full story for example. You never have to calculate how much you owe or are due though, at least not for an individual. You just tell them what your salary is, or if you’re claiming a credit.

[–] brianorca@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The US allows deductions, which can come from a large number of sources. Some examples include interest paid on the mortgage of your primary residence, certain health care costs, or charitable giving. Since your job doesn't know about those, they can't make that calculation in your payroll withholding.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anonono@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Oh that sounds somehow more annoying than just having to pay it yourself, seeing as you have to do the calculations yourself anyway.

it was never about the convenience of the worker, but about making sure they pay. companies act as tax retention agents.

load more comments (1 replies)

Yeah but it's much easier for the rich to find loop holes and not pay their fair share our way. So you see, it's much better! /s

[–] MataVatnik@lemmy.world 103 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I remember one time I spent an hour filing taxes, I accidentally hit a premium option, it literally didn't let me go back to free. On top of that it kept piling on charges. Fuck intuit. Thieving pieces of shit.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

HRBlock is the same.

I refused to use them ever again after they tried to charge me $300 when it was listed as “free”

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

My brother accidentally hit premium a few years ago and the free option is just gone for good for him. It's such bull shit. I've never paid with turbo tax and was convinced he was doing something wrong. Nope, it's literally not available anymore for him.

[–] downpunxx@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Intuit is not your friend or ally, or anyone you want to do business with, or have an account on their many myriad of financial web sites, which they are gobbling up all the time

[–] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Any good alternatives to Credit Karma? Didn't even know Intuit owned them until the other day. :( I moved my funds from their savings account elsewhere but need a good alternative to keep tabs on my credit score.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I don't know how they stack up to credit karma since I've never used them, but personally every bank, credit card, etc. that I use seems to have their own credit score tool somewhere on their app/website.

I suspect they probably don't have quite as much data as something you're specifically paying for, they may update with different frequencies, etc. but if you just kind of want a good idea of what your credit score is and why, they're probably pretty adequate. Probably worth looking into whatever you already have before you look to throw more money at something.

Maybe nerd wallet but I'm sure they're owned by someone shady too.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MeetInPotatoes@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago

Oh man, this feels good because I filed an FTC complaint against them :D

[–] Gestrid@lemmy.ca 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like this might be a good time to plug the IRS Free File Program. It's a program that allows lower-income people to file their tax returns for free. While the program has been gutted in recent years by companies like Intuit leaving the program to either stop offering their services for free or to start offering a "free" alternative, it's still viable. I used it last year to file my taxes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MrEUser@lemmy.ninja 38 points 1 year ago

They should have been forced to do it the other way. “You advertise as free, so you have to provide this for free.”

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fuck the politicians that allow this shit to exist. Good on this move, but to be clear, it's the same folks who enabled it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bakachu@lemm.ee 18 points 1 year ago

I use TurboTax ina free way - calculate all my taxes using their amazing software and then when the numbers match on the free site, I file there. That's the beauty of TurboTax that you can exploit. I feel it's fair game knowing they make the software open and then trick people who have calculated everything out to pay a ridiculous amount for the filing fee at the end.

[–] patchwork@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Services provided by for profit corporations are almost never truly free. It usually means "free" in exchange for access to your user data or "free" if you watch these advertisements. That's not free, it's an exchange of your data that's valuable for resell to a company or your time to watch their ads.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

There's an adage- if the service is free, you aren't the customer.

[–] chloyster@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Intuit will appeal this groundless and seemingly predetermined decision by the FTC to rule in its own favor and is confident that when the matter ultimately returns to a neutral body Intuit will prevail, as it has previously in this matter," the company said.

Lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 14 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The initial decision by Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell was released today and is subject to an automatic review by the full commission.

Moreover, if an Intuit good or service is not free for most US taxpayers, that fact must be "disclosed clearly and conspicuously at the outset of any disclosures required" by the order.

The ruling said that "Intuit had removed several of the most plausibly deceptive advertisements—that is, three videos that repeated the word 'free' a dozen or more times over 30 seconds before a very brief disclaimer."

"However, if Intuit resumes its full advertising campaign... or the facts on the ground change significantly, the FTC may return to this Court to request relief," US District Judge Charles Breyer wrote.

In its response to the administrative law judge's decision, Intuit said it expected the ruling because of the FTC's "flawed and highly questionable process, Chair Lina Khan's previous public and prejudicial statements against Intuit, and the fact that the FTC has ruled in its own favor in nearly every consumer protection case for the last two decades."

"We believe the FTC's decision is improper, wholly ignores the facts, and tramples on the foundations of an independent American judicial system with its serving as prosecutor, judge, and jury on its own matters," Intuit said.


The original article contains 860 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

a temporary problem turned into a permanent solution thanks to politicians who enable this on-top-of-taxes grift.

load more comments
view more: next ›