526
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 103 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

It's really more like Remote Desktop+. It has some additional "features" (slight retch) on top of traditional Remote Desktop features.

Let's wait and see if it's actually more secure than traditional Remote Desktop.

(and I'd still rather use Wine)

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 49 points 4 weeks ago

Did they invent X11 Forwarding over the network?

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 34 points 4 weeks ago

Btw. when we get wayland forwarding over Network?

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 36 points 4 weeks ago

waypipe exists, but it's still not perfect.

[-] Samsy@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 weeks ago

Never heard about this. Thx.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] db2@lemmy.world 17 points 4 weeks ago

Btw. when we get wayland ~~forwarding over Network~~?

[-] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 4 weeks ago

/c/foundthenvidiauser

[-] d_k_bo@feddit.org 16 points 4 weeks ago

Unlike X11, Wayland was never intended to be network transparent. As others say, solutions like waypipe and more tradionally RDP and VNC exist.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 4 weeks ago

Exactly. We won’t. We’ll get specialized video stream over network. I’m not happy about this regression. I understand that was a willing sacrifice to achieve better local performance, but I’m not sure it was worth it.

[-] MinFapper@startrek.website 6 points 4 weeks ago

Their reasoning was that X11 network transparency had been broken for quite some time. If you tried running chrome, most games, or anything with modern hardware acceleration over X11 forwarding, they wouldn't work.

So, IMHO waypipe is actually an improvement in terms of compatibility, rather than a regression.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 6 points 4 weeks ago

You always had the option to send frames over the net using VNC and such. But for many use cases, X over SSH was absolutely fantastic.

I remember using it on a very basic DSL connection to work remotely back in 2005, and it was almost like running local. You don’t get anywhere near the same performance with VNC or RDP.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago

It’s more about security if I recall correctly

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 14 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

X11 can render individual windows (Xclients) through the network on another Xserver since decades. With XPRA you can even buffer them, to move them from one Xserver to another or make sure they survive network disconnect. It's very cool, but not widely used.

[-] potentiallynotfelix@lemdro.id 10 points 4 weeks ago

Yes, the ssh -X flag forwards it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Kushan@lemmy.world 42 points 4 weeks ago

I thought this was dumb as fuck, but I think I understand what Microsoft is trying to do here.

What might not be obvious is that this "Windows" app is for iOS, Android and Linux - yes, it's a replacement for remote desktop but it's specifically a remote desktop app to connect to Windows machines.

So while I still this this rebranding is entirely unnecessary, I can see that they are trying to clearly distinguish "I'm not on windows and I need to do something on windows so I'll use the windows app for that" .

It also means less confusion when "remote desktop" doesn't let you connect to your Mac or whatever.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 31 points 4 weeks ago

One year from now: web search "Windows App broken" and then starting cutting myself.

[-] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

Something tells me the community forums will still refer to it as remote desktop or RDP anyway

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] germanatlas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 4 weeks ago

What the fuck is that title

[-] Emerald@lemmy.world 14 points 4 weeks ago

Some journalist memeing

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] witty_username@feddit.nl 21 points 4 weeks ago

Let me guess. It won't support directx calls?

[-] infeeeee@lemm.ee 41 points 4 weeks ago

It's a remote desktop client, so it won't. OP read only the title of the article

[-] uranibaba@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago
[-] cheddar@programming.dev 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

As I understood this is some remote running layer, while WINE is an emulator.

[-] Bezier@suppo.fi 57 points 4 weeks ago

WINE is an emulator.

ಠ_ಠ

[-] rtxn@lemmy.world 20 points 4 weeks ago

Wine Is Nothing but an Emulator

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 12 points 4 weeks ago

Wine Is Naturally an Emulator

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fluxc0@lemmy.world 28 points 4 weeks ago

Oh dear cheddar, what does WINE stand for?

[-] cheddar@programming.dev 29 points 4 weeks ago
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

(best quality I could find)

[-] notaltaccountlol@lemmy.world 11 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 5 points 4 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ryannathans@aussie.zone 11 points 4 weeks ago
[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 weeks ago

so by now even Microsoft acknowledges that it has lost the battle of making computing synonymous with Windows?

FOSS release of Windows when?

[-] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 10 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

FOSS release of Windows when?

Can you imagine if that entire code got released tomorrow, without Microsoft selectively cleaning it up first?

I remember WinXP getting decompiled a while back and people thought it was pretty wild. Can you imagine Win8+?

Bet we'd find a few comments like #Yes it's a massive security hole but don't ask questions. LOL

I think we'd still be shocked at how much data collection it does. And probably how "I don't know why it works but don't touch it." The code is. (It was written by people, after all)

I've always felt a lot of Windows' "dependability" is really just slick presentation and the mystique of a black box that sounds solid when you knock on it.

But what bothers me so much, as a non-career-coder and DIY-computing learner, is whenever a corporate product breaks, everything is obfuscated with nonsense that is only meant for a company engineer.

At least good FOSS tries to tell you exactly where the issue is.

If Windows went FOSS I bet it would get a lot of human-friendly fixes...and MS would get a lot of new scandals lol.

[-] HStone32@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

i read a blog post by a former MS employee who shed some light on the situation. apparently the windows dev team is entirely made up of junior developers. As soon as anybody gets any experience, either MS tries to promote them to management, or they leave to find a better job.

what that means is there is nobody at MS who has deep knowledge of the Windows kernel. So instead of re-writting, re-factoring or making additions, all they know how to do is add things on top of the existing OS.

[-] areyouevenreal@lemm.ee 5 points 4 weeks ago

I don't think this is strictly true. They do tweak parts of the kernel such as the CPU scheduler to deal with new CPU designs that come out which have special scheduling requirements. That's actually happened quite a bit recently with AMD and Intel both offering CPUs with asymmetric processors with big and little cores, different clock speeds, different cache, sometimes even different instructions on different cores. They also added ReFS not long ago, which may have required some kernel work.

I can understand though if they have few experienced people and way more junior devs. It would probably explain a lot to be honest. A lot of Microsoft stuff is bloated and/or unreliable.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RelativeArea0@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago

HyperV4every1 version whateverthefuckitis

[-] nifty@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

But not all Windows apps can be run via Wine, at least some apps related to some tools I’ve had to use were not available

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Rooki@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago

Let me guess? CLOUD VMS? "Emulation" tries the most generic app: Doesnt work. Office apps will be the only functioning apps.

[-] lengau@midwest.social 3 points 4 weeks ago

To be fair MS Office fully working on Linux is about the only thing we really need to make it completely viable for businesses.

[-] Petter1@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago

The Desktop apps will be replaced with web apps ASAP anyway. Well, I think, as soon they think they have ported enough of the features to the web version.

Are there native arm versions, or are those already webViews?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] partizan@lemm.ee 4 points 4 weeks ago

Sounds awful lot like Citrix...

[-] sonymegadrive@feddit.uk 3 points 4 weeks ago

Yo dawg…

*xibit-meme.jpg*

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
526 points (96.6% liked)

linuxmemes

21019 readers
349 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS