498
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 27 points 3 weeks ago

Hey boss, I'm logging this ticket as tech debt. We need to take this on to hit our marketing deadline, and as soon as the project is over we need two scrum cycles to resolve it.

Two years later...

This ticket has been open forever, can we just delete it since nobody is ever going to clean this up? It's messing up our velocity metric.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 18 points 3 weeks ago

As long as "cleaner than you found it" also includes "better documented." I've worked with people who think that "the code should speak for itself" to the point that they will make biased decisions with no explanation or documentation and then if you ask them about it after their response is "look at the PR for how that decision was made." I'm not going to git blame and find your PR to find an outcome from an argument between two people that after scrolling just says "sometimes the API returns a JSON string here instead of nested JSON so we have this conditional" when that could be a comment

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago

Not to mention that sometimes, the code that's supposed to "speak for itself" doesn't do the things that they think it would do.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Right. Given the option I will always choose to work with a decent programmer who can communicate well and documents their code, over a very strong programmer that doesn’t think they should waste time with documentation

[-] 0x0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 weeks ago

The code is speaking to me, but it's just word salad.

[-] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 5 points 2 weeks ago

In particular business logic that's not obvious should be documented in comments. // Typically 1 = 1, but on March accounting wants that 1 = 2. This function makes that mapping.

[-] DarkFox@pawb.social 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)
// 8 attempts have been made to clean up this code.
// A total of 47 hours have been wasted here. 
// Update the counters after your attempt.
[-] unreachable@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago

# yeah, this needs to be done later

later: never

[-] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Few of the good ones I've spotted:

(complicated business logic in messy code) // TODO: check

(...) // TODO: think about better naming

(...) // TODO: This is obviously shit and needs to be changed.

(...) // TODO: THIS IS NOT USED ANYWHERE CONSIDER REMOVING ALTOGETHER (comment made 3 years ago)

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 5 points 3 weeks ago

Break the code altogether and abandon it forever and just start over.

[-] superkret@feddit.org 7 points 3 weeks ago

ToDo's belong in tickets, not in the code.

[-] MarauderIIC@dormi.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

Todo with ticket number

[-] Azzk1kr@feddit.nl 3 points 3 weeks ago

Write a ticket, mentioning "tackle TODOs" 😅

[-] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

//TODO: Refactor this method Git commit date: 10‐11‐2016

// Todo - Stuff

[-] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago

Hi it's me, your colleague

[-] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 weeks ago

Hi colleague! So I found a comment in the code from 3 years ago by you saying you should "improve this". Is it planned for the next sprint?

[-] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I'll get right on that, as soon as I wrap up these 3 defects

[-] tyo_ukko@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 weeks ago

Just remember to mark all the things you'd like to make better but can't be arsed to at the moment with numerous TODOs.

[-] Phoenix3875@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

// TODO: Leave the code cleaner than you found

[-] Mac@mander.xyz -1 points 3 weeks ago

Drake meme? Even with all the alternatives?
Ew

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
498 points (98.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

32247 readers
221 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS