137
submitted 2 weeks ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.zip

Broadcom "preventing some vendors from selling products to us," AT&T alleges.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] st3ph3n@midwest.social 50 points 2 weeks ago

Broadcom continues to be a bunch of exploitative fucks, surprised pikachu.

[-] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 weeks ago

As are AT&T.. Surprised pikachu!

[-] lightsblinken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

i've heard they like money?!!!

[-] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 27 points 2 weeks ago

Wow. I think the six people on the planet Earth who didn’t see this coming after the buyout last year will be shocked.

I mean we’ve even got a bingo card so to say of what to expect.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 weeks ago

"It couldn't possibly happen to me"

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 weeks ago

Aw, a corporation upset when another corporation does the kind of shit that corporations tend to do with regular people, thanks to the years and years of corporate lobbying allowing corporations to do whatever the fuck they want.

I almost had a tear.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

Not just any corporation, but one that's done this exact kind of thing themselves

There is no good guy here

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 weeks ago
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

Hello open solutions

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago

my previous employer was at work scripting their own workarounds for stuff like DRS and distributed switches so they could drop down to the standard licenses.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Move to open solutions. You buy a Proxmox license and you get it all.

If you don't like Proxmox you could even implement something yourself as it is all open solutions. Libvirt supports live transfers with little effort.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

yeah I'm sure that is their long term goal now.

[-] TheMadIrishman@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 weeks ago

I’m rooting for both sides to lose, and for Bane to win.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

it seems AT&T may be interested in looking for alternatives to VMware?

https://xcp-ng.org/blog/2022/10/19/migrate-from-vmware-to-xcp-ng/

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago

They have a huge amount of machines. If I am remembering correctly it was something like 8,000 physical servers with a lot more VMs.

[-] tabris@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

I used to work for a major telecoms compass until recently, working on their VMWare stack and to say they are a major customer of VMWare is to put it mildly. The cost for VMWare has skyrocketed after the Broadcom deal, so while the team were gearing up for the next gen system utilising more tools from the ESXi stack, now that's entirely abandoned and instead they're tooling up to replace it. That's over 500,000 VMs across a dozen or so datacenters. Broadcom's actions may make them a lot of money in the next few years as their customers are forced to pay this huge hike, but it won't last for long.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 weeks ago

Broadcom is not playing the long game. They will milk VMware and then dump it or dissolve the company.

Funny enough Broadcom is not doing so well right now (check there stock)

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

This sort of buy-fatten-milk-kill acquisition should just be flat out illegal

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

I don't really see a problem with it. It painful short term but has the benefit of breaking up centralization and single points of failure.

[-] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure I follow your logic there, it looks to me like it has the opposite long term effect by removing what competition actually is there

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Well no. VMware had a monopoly but now they have successfully pushed everyone to other software. Not everyone is using the same alternative so the market is more diverse.

[-] oxomoxo@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

My work has used Nutanix since 2012, which is expensive but has been super reliable and was a game changer when they came out years ago. You can load whatever hypervisor and we continued to use VMware for years because “industry standard”. Almost two years ago I realized we could save a ton of money if we just migrated to Acropolis HV, which is their in-house solution that just puts a fancy web interface over KVM. It has been super solid and works basically the same.

Broadcom buys VMware and I end up looking like Nostradamus. It was just lucky timing.

When we are up for renewal I am considering going a step further and moving to Proxmox on 45Drives hardware. We use them for storage and their support for open source has been amazing.

[-] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

I’m very broken up about this

this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
137 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

1261 readers
207 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS