1304
submitted 3 days ago by sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmy.ml

You will go straight to jail 😡😡😡

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 30p87@feddit.org 138 points 3 days ago

12ft.io almost never works for me tbh.

Also, appending before something is called prepending, similar to how a prefix after something is a suffix.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 71 points 3 days ago

Archive.is is definitely not an alternative that people should use in this situation

[-] SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net 15 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Nor archive.ph, which appears to be the same site? Idk how that works. Definitely not a site anyone should go to, though.

[-] lars@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 days ago

Nor archive.md nor archive.today, which appear to be run by the same rogue actors and serve the same content as archive.is and archive.ph. Beware.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 18 points 3 days ago

I'd like to prepend that this dude is correct.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wow, I feel like the most upvoted solutions here don't work, and meanwhile some obvious and widely known alternatives are being completely overlooked.

❌ Inspect Element - many modern sites don't even include the full article in the paywalled html, so this wouldn't work. Also sitting there and mousing over elements and deleting them one by one, is tedious, it's easy to accidentally delete an element that encloses the content you intended to keep, or to drive yourself crazy trying to figure out how elements are nested.

❌ Ublock Zapper - a similar to the above, won't work on stub articles, and just janky because you're manually zapping things

❌ Disabled JavaScript - Similar to the above, same problem because many articles are stubs anyway. And the HTML layers that block your view don't have to be done with JavaScript.

❌ Rapid copy and paste of the article to notepad or rapidly printing the screen - similar problem to the above, lots of places just post the stub of an article, and besides nobody should live their life this way rapidly trying to print screen or copy everything. If you're trying to do a quick copy you're going to grab all kinds of gobbledygunk from the page and probably have to manually filter it out.

❌ Reader Mode - Your browsers reader mode will be hit and miss because, again, many sites post stub articles, and it's possible the pay wall stuff will just get formatted into the reader mode along with an incomplete article.

✅ Archive.is - works!

✅ Pocket and Instapaper - amazingly, nobody has mentioned these even though they're probably the longest running (dating back to 2007-2008), possibly most widely known, and most consistent solutions that still work to this day. They keep their own local caches of articles, so it's not depending on the full content being visible on the page.

✅ Other dedicated extensions - Dedicated browser extensions seem to work, but be careful what you're signing yourself up for.

🤷‍♀️ Brave - It works, but, it's a Chromium supported browser, so ultimately Google controls the destiny and can drive Chromium to incorporate fundamental frameworks supporting DRM and pushing their preferred web standards.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 85 points 3 days ago

Definitely don't use uBlock Origin's zapper mode to get rid of elements on the page that are blocking your view.

[-] janNatan@lemmy.ml 36 points 3 days ago

Disabling JavaScript through ublock origin also does the same (horrible) thing, frequently.

[-] Furball@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 days ago

I’ve used ublock for years and only recently discovered the zapper and it’s my new favorite thing on the internet

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] rockerface@lemm.ee 12 points 3 days ago

cocks the element zapper Say hello to my little friend!

[-] RandomVideos@programming.dev 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I have been using inspect element to manually remove ads and other annoying things

Thanks for reminding me that i can just use ublock origin!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

And never, EVER disable JavaScript on that website and reload the page! Not even if your Ad blocker lets you selectively do it.

[-] QuentinCallaghan@sopuli.xyz 56 points 3 days ago

And God forbid if someone uses archiving sites like archive.is!

[-] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Truly awful. How will the news megacorp get its money? You wouldn't steal the information required for you to be aware of world events? Right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago
[-] bunkyprewster@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Explain more please?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 28 points 3 days ago

Doesn't NYT cut off most of the article now? I used to just be able to disable JS but that didn't work anymore last I checked.

[-] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I use this extension and it lets me bypass pretty much every paywall including NYT's

[-] hunt4peas@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Best extension along with uBlock Origins!

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah the article stub doesn't link to the article. It links to a login flow with the article id. If you go directly to the article you get redirected if you don't have a session.

It's incredibly easy to make an impossible to get around paywall. Porn has done it since the Internet existed.

In this very particular situation I'm glad most companies are lazy and stupid.

I don't particularly care if a company does pay only content. I think its legitimately ok. I hate companies that don't make you pay enough for the service to cover their costs thus leading to complete enshitifaction.

[-] ChuckEffingNorris@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 days ago

I thought the issue was they wanted search engines to be able to see the content, but not non paying viewers? Hence slightly shitty paywalls.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Metostopholes@midwest.social 44 points 3 days ago

Back during prohibition in the US, there was a product called Vine-Glo that was a brick of grape concentrate. It came with a warning: "After dissolving the brick in a gallon of water, do not place the liquid in a jug away in the cupboard for twenty days, because then it would turn into wine."

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 16 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

Firefox has a button that shows up in the url that kind of turns the webpage into an e-book-esque view that pops up for most articles (especially Pay Wall)

[-] drbluefall@toast.ooo 5 points 2 days ago

reader mode ftw

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 27 points 3 days ago

I just hope nobody clicks the reader view button in the top right, it would be just terrible if they got an ad free, paywall free version of the site

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Many sites don't work like that and don't even load the content from the server before the paywall check.

But I have a trick that work 100% of the time. Just don't read those sites.

I get that journalism and entertainment magazines have workers and need to be paid BUT:

They were getting paid when I could pay a cheap physical newspaper if I want to read it and usually had those for free anyway. As you'll get newspapers on most public places and one single newspaper would serve a whole family. In my house we didn't really paid more than 4€ a month and got physical things that you could just keep. Now with digital distribution you own nothing and it is far more expensive. So... No. Also they get a ton of public money through institutional advertisement, so I'm already basically paying for them without getting access to their content.

So unless they are willing to change their model I'll just refuse to read them. I'm happier without their clickbaits anyway.

[-] abbenm@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago

So unless they are willing to change their model I’ll just refuse to live.

Wait what

[-] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Saddest typo ever.

I just won't tell this to my psychologist, just in case.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 12 points 2 days ago

DO NOT DISABLE JAVASCRIPT USING AN EXTENSIONS BECAUSE THAT WILL MAKE TRACKING STOP WORKING AND BYPASS PAYWALLS.

[-] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

It will also simultaneously render the vast majority of the internet useless, and not only the shitty parts that you don't want/need anyway.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago

12ft hardly works for anything for me anymore deeper-sadness

[-] QuietCupcake@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

Yeah, unfortunately 12ft.io didn't keep up with the paywall arms race. It's too bad because it was one of those things that a lot of people knew about, many of whom may now just give up when it doesn't work even though there are other options out there.

As one example, there's now also the 13ft ladder: https://github.com/wasi-master/13ft It's like 12ft but self hosted. Sounds really good but I can't vouch for it yet.

I mostly would just archive a paywallrd page with archive.is (aka archive.today, archive.ph, etc.) and that worked great and also helped take traffic away from asshole sites that paywall content. Unfortunately, archive started requiring a cloud flare captcha when archiving a page. This is a deal breaker for me since captcha totally deanonymizes you and is used for tracking purposes and even to train AI. So it defeats a good chunk of the purpose of using an archive site.

Still, there's a good chance that someone else already archived the page you want to see, so putting the url in archive.is search can be enough to bypass the paywall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlpacaChariot@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

"Append...before", AKA "prepend"!

[-] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 17 points 3 days ago

I always break the ctrl key right off my keyboard when I get a new computer so I don't accidentally do this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

Archive.ph >12ft.io

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 3 days ago

not NOT use firefox' reading mode.

[-] AgentGrimstone@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

Absolutely do not inspect elements and start deleting stuff! Leave them alone!

[-] tilefan@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago

my browser always asks if I want the simplified view which always bypasses the paywall

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] trespasser69@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Thank you so much! I already did it! (Smash Ctrl+P as fast as possible)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] attero@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 2 days ago

You would never use DuckDuckGo as your default search engine and then type !archiveis in front of your urlbar visiting a news site.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
1304 points (99.2% liked)

Memes

45471 readers
586 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS