this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
44 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7759 readers
9 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The foundational 1935 labor law protecting workers is unconstitutional, according to major corporations and right-wing zealots who believe they have enough votes on the Supreme Court to overturn it. In the latest sign that anti-union forces will doggedly press the matter, a federal judge for the Northern District of Texas enjoined the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) from processing any allegations of employer violations of workers’ rights. The National Review hailed the decision as ​“A Welcome Blow to the NLRB.”

..

But, in trying to repeal all the rights and protections workers gained during the New Deal, including the limited protections that workers currently enjoy for organizing and engaging in collective bargaining, killing the 1935 National Labor Relations Act (also known as the Wagner Act) would also mean the lifting of a host of restrictions on unions’ ability to carry out solidarity activism and effective economic sanctions.

..

Assuming that the Supreme Court sticks to its cowardly practice of dumping its most unpopular decisions in the last week of the term in which it hears arguments, we have 20 months until the NLRB is shut down. In some ways, that is a luxurious amount of lead time for unions, which are capable of a tremendous amount of coordination. But debate and discussion need to begin now, not one year from now when the Supreme Court majority tips its hand during oral arguments. The right wing could not be clearer about their intentions. We must be ready.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Guess we're gonna have to go back to just shooting the business owner instead of meeting at a bargaining table with lawyers. Shame.

[–] Bloobish@hexbear.net 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah honestly wondering how the empire thinks this will long term go? Especially as everything else collapses except for cops bashing in heads is the only guaranteed government service when do people just start returning to the old ways of settling things?

[–] Sickos@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

Hopefully soon I am bored out of my mind

[–] InevitableSwing@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

This is after Elon Musk’s SpaceX won a similar injunction against the NLRB before the Western District of Texas in July. Both cases will work their way up to the Fifth Circuit Court, which has served as an expressway to steer anti-regulatory legal appeals to the Supreme Court ever since Trump packed it with right-wing ideologues.

This is bleak. If the six GOP turds on the supreme court want to overturn the law - they will.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 12 points 2 months ago

say-the-line-bart-1

say-the-line-bart-2 "In a 6-3 Supreme Court decision today..."

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

Lmao one of the foundational lib "pro" labour concessions are going to be overturned at the centre of empire? Such freedom and democracy this system gives you!

[–] Barx@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Unless unions plan and execute an extended general strike, there is literally no reason for anyone on the SC to care.