328
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 day ago

And if Elmo does it again, he'll get an even stronger warning.

It must be nice to live a consequence-free life.

[-] auzy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Investigations take time.

Don't be surprised if Elon is already under investigation in the background

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Usually, if Musk's PAC does not comply, the DOJ initiates an investigation phase. Gets a court order to preserve all documents and xoorspondence, etc.

[-] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

And we've seen that the DOJ is a real stand-up operation the last 8 years, haven't we

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Don't know. Ask Jack Smith.

[-] n1ck_n4m3@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

One unspoiled egg in a factory of spoiled eggs doesn't instill in me much hope.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 104 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

THEN FUCKING ARREST HIM.

Jesus. The rule of law is dead.

[-] Crankenstein@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago

Maybe people will wake up to understand our system of "law and order" never was meant to serve people, only capital.

[-] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Excellent point, comrade.

[-] FlowVoid@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

The Justice Department warned Elon Musk’s America PAC

They can't arrest a PAC.

[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago

SovCits destroyed by this one simple trick:

I am a PAC.

I am invincible!

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 102 points 2 days ago

Can we revoke his government contracts now?

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Why don’t we seize his companies and most of his money?

Give him a billion dollars and a yacht and exile him.

[-] _bcron_@lemmy.world 80 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Pussyfooting about something is condoning it. It's the justice department and they can't make a binary yes/no conclusion on the legality of this? "We're warning you that you may get in trouble" is a green light to continue, they said it themselves, it's merely questionable, and Elon Musk has infinite resources to have a legal team spin it all back on the DOJ

[-] MagicShel@lemmy.zip 31 points 2 days ago

I wish what they'd say is, "we will prosecute this and a jury will decide."

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Elon's banking on it not mattering in 3 months.

[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

People joke about strongly worded letters...

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

'may' be?. try is

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 26 points 2 days ago

No lawyer, but so often you'll see a judge discuss the intent of the law vs. the letter of the law and make judgement on that, sometimes helping to change the law in question. Here we have a case where the argument is that he isn't paying someone to vote a certain way or even to vote, so it's not technically breaking existing law. But we all see what's going on, so the intent is clear.

Nothing will happen to him mainly because of him being untouchable, plus the time frame. This just needs to serve as a lesson to act on for the future and get the laws caught up with the times, where absolutely the rich and powerful are influencing political direction in so many ways, and have been for a long time. It needs to stop.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 20 points 2 days ago

It’s illegal to offer someone something of value, which explicitly includes lottery entries, in exchange for their being registered to vote.

No idea why there’s a “may be” about any of this.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

Could that depend on state law, since states control the actual election processes? I would think if it was universally written that clear then actual justice officials would be saying so.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Linktank@lemmy.today 23 points 2 days ago

May be? Are they not sure? Aren't they the guys who should know for sure?

[-] zephorah@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

May? How is it not a bribe?

[-] LavenderDay3544@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

Citizens United and SpeechNow opened the door to this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] zipzoopaboop@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 days ago

He knows. Fucking do something about it

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 10 points 2 days ago

If I did this they'd be beating me with a rubber hose on my front lawn. Why's he get a "warning"?

(I know why)

[-] negativenull@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Edited source and title to CNN

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

If I’m understanding correctly, this sounds like lip service and nothing more than a side-eye glare from the DOJ while muttering quietly, “Don’t. Stop. That’s ‘illegal’” in Musk’s general direction.

They have as many teeth as the SEC has had when it comes to Musk’s “AlLEdgEd” shenanigans.

🙄 🤦‍♂️

[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago

So, here's my test: someone without his clout do the exact same thing except with $100. If that person gets charged but Musk doesn't, that tells you exactly why Musk will get away with it.

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

As it should!

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

#IS illegal*, you yellow-bellied felch suckers.

[-] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

I, for one, am still waiting on the Bill Gates money from all those times I forwarded that email

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
328 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19107 readers
4040 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS