1200
Eat lead (mander.xyz)
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

The correct answer would have been: "Why should I? You're an idiot."

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

WERE YOU THERE TO SEE IT???? - The next moronic rebuttal

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

"Whatever! Pssshhh!"

[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 day ago

In the begining, was uranium, and the uranium was not stable?

[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

I had a dude come up to me at the reference desk and tell me that the earth can’t be billions (he said trillions, lol) of years old because erosion from the Mississippi River would make it wider and deeper than it is. I pulled up some info including the idea that the Mississippi was something that came about more recently because of plate shifting, etc and he just said, "Nah."

[-] Cutecity@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

This proof is partial though. This assumes there is only 1 way of obtaining lead. What if lead appeared from fusion in stars younger than that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago
[-] friendly_ghost@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

I think you meant to say a-lead-gedly

[-] Chekhovs_Gun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

ALLEADGEDLY

There's evidence of human civilization and agriculture going back at least 10,000 years. You have to be extremely willfully ignorant to think the earth is only 4,000 years old. Hell the pyramid of Giza is older than that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago

There’s bread from 14,000 years ago

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 day ago

Look I don't like them either, but you can't refer to crusty bishops that way

[-] DrBob@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Is decay the only way to get lead? I mean if uranium gets synthesized can't lead get made as well?

[-] Fermion@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Radioactive decay is not the only way to make lead, and lead is produced in much greater abundance than uranium.

The part that's missing in the post is in looking specifically at uranium deposits and making assumptions about the initial composition of the deposits, since the crystalline structure excludes lead when the crystals form. So if you detect lead contained within zircon, it is assumed to be the product of radioactive decay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rooskie91@discuss.online 7 points 1 day ago

The tragedy is that humans aren't convinced to change their minds by facts like this. They're convinced by good stories from their friends and family.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yeah this doesn’t do squat to prove or disprove anything to these nutters.

I’ve done the same with a variety of other things and you will get told the same thing:

God put it here.

Thing is you cannot argue with the above statement because it falls into that sort of argument you used to have when you were a child when the other kid would say ‘Nyah! Last word!!’ or ‘I can’t hear you!!’

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1200 points (93.0% liked)

Science Memes

10770 readers
2521 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS