440
submitted 1 day ago by lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org to c/news@lemmy.world

I am not a teen.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OlPatchy2Eyes@slrpnk.net 1 points 34 minutes ago

Not a teen here but the amount of sex that show characters have seems crazy to me and I genuinely think it affected me because I couldn't keep up as an impressionable child. It's ok to have lots of sex but do we have to act like that's normal and that I should be suffering when I go more than a month without sex?

[-] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 19 points 6 hours ago

Not jusr sex. Most romance can be deleted from series and movies and they would not lose any plot. It is virtually always shoehorned in.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 27 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The issue isn't sex itself. It's putting a sex scene in most movies meant for adult audiences. Imagine if there had to be a shootout or extended martial arts fight in every romance movie or Hollywood just wouldn't fund it.

Use it where it makes sense, and leave it in the tool box when it doesn't.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 minutes ago

I thought they added romance to action movies for the female viewers. Lack of creativity turned romance into mostly sex.

[-] ALoafOfBread@lemmy.ml 15 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 58 seconds ago)

It's fucking crazy to me that this is a hot take these days. I just want movies to be good. Throwing unnecessary sex scenes into a movie to drive ratings up usually does not achieve that.

Edit: And by unnecessary, I don't even mean just not plot relevant. Only that they should add to, not detract from, the characterization, tone, or plot. Fucking loved Challengers (check it out, it's great) and that had a sex scene like every 5 minutes. I just wanna watch some good fucking movies. If I wanted to watch good fucking-movies, I'd just find those online.

[-] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 8 hours ago

I saw... killing joke? Whatever movie was made off of that. The Batman Batgirl Makeout was completely unnecessary and more than a bit disturbing.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 45 points 12 hours ago

Watching softcore porn with your friends and family is kind of undesirable.

[-] figaro@lemdro.id 35 points 13 hours ago

Well yeah, I think this is universal. No one wants to watch a sex scene with their parents

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] TwistedTurtle@monero.town 48 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I have strong feelings about this because I miss horny comedies like American Pie, and sexy thrillers like Wild Things. I miss stuff like Fast Times at Ridgemont High, Boogie Nights, Office Space, Eyes Wide Shut, True Lies. They all had sex/nudity in a way that furthered the plot, or was just plain fun. All of the criticisms I see here sadden me:

• "It doesn't further the plot!!!"

It can absolutely be an important part of the story. See the examples above. Look at most of our ancient mythologies. On top of that I pose the question: Why does it have to further the plot?! Why does sex/nudity have to justify itself when tons of movies have gratuitous action scenes and violence that add nothing to the plot? 90% of John Wick is gratuitous violence that added nothing to the story (but I still love it). Our culture celebrates violence and we'll watch people get tortured to death without batting an eye - but if some tits show up on screen then suddenly everyone becomes a critic analyzing whether the story REALLY needed it or not.

• "I don't want to watch that with my kids/parents/coworkers/etc"

I agree. So don't. Some of my favorite movies are raunchy comedies or sexy thrillers that I would never want to watch in polite company. That doesn't mean they shouldn't exist! If art were constrained by what you wanted to display in front of your kids/parents/coworkers then our artistic & cultural landscape would be a much bleaker place.

• "We have easy access to porn, I don't need porn in my movies!"

The fact that you only equate sex/nudity to porn reveals a problem. Kids today can’t associate sex/nudity on a screen as art, or even just fun, anymore - because in their minds sex/nudity is inextricably tied to porn. The reality is sex/nudity can be fun, dramatic, scary, or funny depending on the context. It can have a place in many kinds of stories, and comparing it to porn is like saying "we have war documentaries so we don't need war movies." They are completely different things!!

• "It's usually cringey & not done well."

By that logic you could make arguments against a lot of different genres and classic story elements. I don't like the argument that because media these days sucks at doing something they should avoid it altogether. I think they should just do better. Movies in the 80s and 90s proved it can be done.


It’s disturbing to me that we’re culturally encouraged to find fun in violence but sex needs to be cordoned off to a containment genre and excised from mainstream art. I’m not saying it needs to be in every movie - but its been obvious for a while they’re going out of their way to avoid it, even in places where it would make sense or be fun. I want art to stop awkwardly excluding a major part of life. I want out of this "Everyone is beautiful and no one is horny" Twilight Zone multiverse that all our modern movies seem to take place in.

Sex is too important to be left to porn.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 2 points 7 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

Yes. Yes, yes, yes. I was having this exact conversation in another thread in c/movies not three days ago. The fear of sex is just astounding to me. And it being equated only to porn was more than a little troubling.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

If violence doesn't further the plot then it shouldn't be in there either.

Nobody is saying you can't have sexy comedies. We're just tired of stupid shit like the mid-life threatening event romance scene. The timer on the bomb is literally counting down and they take the time to profess their love and it's not a comedy so I'm the asshole for laughing in the theater.

It's been ridiculous for decades and we're tired of it.

[-] TwistedTurtle@monero.town 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If violence doesn’t further the plot then it shouldn’t be in there either.

A lot of action movies would be very short. My poor kung fu movies would need to be cut down to about 15 minutes. Why can't we sometimes just have gratuitous things for the fun of it? Not everything needs to be high art.

We’re just tired of stupid shit like the mid-life threatening event romance scene. The timer on the bomb is literally counting down and they take the time to profess their love and it’s not a comedy so I’m the asshole for laughing in the theater.

I don't think that's an inherent problem with sex/nudity/romance, the problem is just bad filmmaking. With good writing/acting/directing/editing that exact cliche' scenario you describe could be done in such a way as to be genuinely funny, or touching, or sexy.

[-] BottleOfAlkahest@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Nobody is arguing that all movies need to remove violence or sexy? Where are you even getting that from?

But no one here is arguing the problem is inherently with sex or romance....you pulled that assumption out of your ass. The entire point of this thread is that unnecessary sex or violence is a crutch of bad film making...

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago

Sure. Sometimes. As a specific movie made for that. Not every single show and movie producers can cram it into.

[-] TwistedTurtle@monero.town 4 points 9 hours ago

Agreed. Too often it feels like they're just trying to check a box or fill time.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 5 points 14 hours ago

I would appreciate less violence too. It feels like since GoT they have to put some gory violence and some sex scenes into everything that is targeted at an adult audience.

The point really is not about fundamental opposition. It is about being oversaturated and hence tired of it. That is why it is annoying when it doesn't further the plot, is done cringey or well, seems like an attempt at being porn of some sort. That stuff worked in the 80s and 90s, when people still had to rent VHS. People being addicted to porn and harming themselves with their overconsumption but being in denial about it probably also adds in here.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

To be fair game of thrones turned out to be a scam. At the time we thought there was plot reasons for literally everything.

I can't even get 15 minutes through episode one now before the plot utterly collapses and I have to stop.

[-] DjMeas@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago

Great points! Personally for me I can do with less gorey violence. What I'm most interested in is good action sequences.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Even in kids movies I get questions like "does the goomba die when Mario smashes it?"

Thats maybe an absurd example but I think it highlights how we see stories where characters often solve their problems with violence, even as a first choice.

Sometimes the tone is wildly off too, like watching the good guy kill multiple people and then everyone is jovial about it.

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 58 minutes ago

All those comic book movies are especially weird.

Slaughter their way through an army of henchmen who presumably have families and homes to go to and are nothing more than hired goons, before getting to the mastermind and mostly just giving them a firm telling off and taking them to prison.

[-] lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 15 hours ago

Oh man, I wish I could give you more than one upvote. Thank you for this well reasoned defense of sex in movies.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 16 points 17 hours ago

I remember watching the wolf of wall street on opening day with my parents when I was a teen.

Based on that experience, I agree, that was so awkward lol

[-] sOlitude24k@lemmy.myserv.one 8 points 15 hours ago

So, way back in the day, when Borat was released, basically my whole household loved it. Then, Bruno was announced! Another movie from the same guy, excellent!

Wrong.

I took my mom to go see it. In theaters. I don't think I can really put into words the awkwardness of sitting through that film.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

It always hit me kind of weird that getting a sci-fi novel without sex required me to read YA

[-] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

I absolutely despise media that relies on sex for the plot. It just ruins it for me. I'm also not a teen.

[-] TwistedTurtle@monero.town 13 points 15 hours ago

You would hate most Greek mythology

[-] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

And some religious texts.

[-] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 6 points 12 hours ago

Why is that swan leering at me...

[-] intensely_human@lemm.ee 3 points 12 hours ago
[-] irotsoma@lemmy.world 77 points 1 day ago

It's the stupid toxic "romance" that I want rid of. It gets so boring and tedious to watch. If it's important to the story, then fine. But otherwise can we just normalize friendship between opposite gendered people without the need for bad relationship drama, jealousy, and normalizing the idea that when someone says no, they're actually just "playing hard to get".

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
440 points (94.7% liked)

News

23235 readers
3379 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS