638
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Summary

Trend underlines vast gender divide as election approaches, as experts say some women face pressure to ‘toe the line’ politically at home.

A TikTok trend of women "canceling out" their partners’ votes highlights a gender divide in the 2024 election, with many young women supporting Kamala Harris while their male partners back Trump. Campaigns encourage women, especially those in conservative households, to vote independently, emphasizing privacy through ads featuring voices like Michelle Obama and Liz Cheney. Conservatives like Charlie Kirk and Jesse Watters criticize these efforts, claiming they undermine family values.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 107 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

If my partner were voting fascist they wouldn't be my partner.

[-] CrazyFrog97@discuss.online 39 points 3 days ago

If my partner were voting fascist they would be my partner.

Well they wouldn't be mine!

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 36 points 3 days ago

That's what I meant to say. I'm so tired.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

Hydrate. Recreate. Hibernate.

[-] MapleEngineer@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I had chemo for Hodgins this afternoon. Napping with the cats and drinking lots of water.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

Oh god that's awful. Yeah you get to miss an n't or two. Be well!

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 148 points 3 days ago

STOP. FUCKING. REPUBLICANS.

Look, I know women in these situations often have no easy way to get out from the financial situation they're in, or will be alone and unsafe with a vengeful partner. I feel terribly for anyone in that situation, and if I knew anyone like that personally I would offer to help them.

But don't fuck them in the first place.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

I mean, personally, I'm a financially safe option.

But then you'd have to meet me, and to meet me I would need time and energy to get out of the house, and it becomes this whole thing and I'd just rather not

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 126 points 3 days ago

You want to know why Republicans did a hard course change on mail in voting for 2024?

THIS is why. The husband can ensure the wife fills out her ballot “correctly” in the comfort of their own home, instead of the wife filling it out as she sees fit at the polling station.

[-] stoy@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 days ago

Here in Sweden, you can change your vote even if it is mailed in.

If you vote in person on election day, your earlier vote won't be counted

[-] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 52 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

You can do that in the US*. My ex had to do it when her dad stole her ballot in 2016 and voted for Trump.

We got the last laugh, though. He was a massive anti masker and then died of COVID. Wasn't really that funny though...just sad all around.

*Edit to add - some places in the US

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 20 points 3 days ago

US election rules are extremely regional, this isn’t true everywhere.

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 13 points 3 days ago

Voter suppression is a real disease like gerrymandering.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago

Oops i spoiled the ballot. Too late to get another one, guess I'll vote in person.

[-] adespoton@lemmy.ca 28 points 3 days ago

“Oh, I’m sorry honey! I’ve got plans to be out with the boys guarding the polling station on election day; you’ll have to stay home and take care of the children. Maybe you can vote next time….”

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Nougat@fedia.io 168 points 3 days ago

Conservatives like Charlie Kirk and Jesse Watters criticize these efforts, claiming they undermine family values.

So Kirk and Watters (among others, I'm sure) believe that individual voters casting their votes independently based on their own judgment "undermines family values." Got it.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 106 points 3 days ago

I agree. The husbands voting for Trump independently really undermines family values.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 74 points 3 days ago

It brings up the most damning dichotomy. That women would feel the need to hide their vote for Harris, but men don't feel like they need to hide their vote for Trump. I wonder why that might be.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 77 points 3 days ago

The irony here is Jesse Waters cheated on his ex wife. So, who's actually undermining family values here? And it ain't the women.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 35 points 3 days ago

He is the one that said woman voting independently is "as bad as an affair" as well.

Dude reveling in his shitbaggerity and just winking at the camera. He certainly knows his audience.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I wish these "men" would take some time off to get help with their issues instead of inflicting them on everybody else.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

They are habitual liars. Nothing they say is in good faith. Charlie is a terrorist who helped finance an attack on the capitol, the article should bring that up if they want to cite him as a reference for anything political.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] orclev@lemmy.world 97 points 3 days ago

claiming they undermine family values.

Oh really? And exactly which values are those? Perhaps that women should obey their husbands commands and be glorified slaves? They can't very well say that quite part out loud yet now can they. That would actually cost them some votes they really can't afford.

Not even slaves - combination incubators/dishwashers/laundry machines.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

You're sugarcoating religious extremism; just describing an average 1950's housewife...

What they want is Gilead. The sharia law of the Taliban, but Christian!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 67 points 3 days ago

They should Cancel out their relationship as well. If your partner is willing to vote away your rights gleefully and you stay with them?! (╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻)

[-] vxx@lemmy.world 25 points 3 days ago

A lot of people stay in abusive relationships for a long time.

[-] Lennny@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Shit, there's a party that's trying to to make our whole country more of a giant abusive relationship.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 13 points 3 days ago

White women are #2 in the hierarchy of structural racism, and they know it, deep down. Whether they admit to it is a whole other scenario.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TommySoda@lemmy.world 76 points 3 days ago

My parents have been voting opposite since they met and very rarely had issues. They just don't talk about politics and they've made it work for 40 years. How about be a fucking man stop trying to control your partner. Women had to fight for their right to vote so as far as I'm concerned they can do whatever the fuck they want.

[-] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Maybe it's a generational divide or something, but I would lose my fucking mind if my partner for life were braindead enough to support trump. Maybe Clinton v Dole was just a more reasonable thing to disagree with your spouse about (idk, I wasn't there, and I don't care enough to look into it, don't @ me), but a disagreement in 2024 fundamentally is about democracy v fascism, helping people v hurting people, and decency v shameless petulance. A politically split household in 2024 is not a team or a partnership in any meaningful way. Just fucking get a divorce already because you've clearly married the wrong person! There's absolutely no fucking way I could cohabitate with, let alone share a bed with somebody who wants women, children, immigrants, minorities, LGBTQ+ people, and poor people to be punished in every aspect of life for not being financially comfortable, straight, white, cis men. Truly incomprehensible. "But taxes! But gas prices!" No. Just no. You're clearly not actually paying attention if you think that literally anything would be better for you under trump. There would be short term gains at the expense of long term collapse, just like what happened when you gave him the keys last time.

And I don't mean you specifically. Just the rhetorical "you" for anybody it would apply to.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

It's one thing to have different opinions and another to have a partner that believes a convicted rapist with an unimaginable amount of blood on his hands should lead the fucking army to start mass murdering civilians he doesn't like. The guy is cartoon levels of evil, it's fucking ridiculous.

Yeah I have to agree.

I'm not in the US, the leader of our conservative party (not presently in power) is a douche but not like Trump.

In the present climate I doubt my partner would vote conservative, but if she did I could live with it.

If she voted for someone as messed up as Trump I would genuinely struggle with that. I feel like it would be indicative of deeper problems.

[-] Nuke_the_whales@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Thing is people of opposing politics can work together. Trump isn't politics, it's fascism. If we really wanted to see political opposites working together, Republicans could put country first and get rid of Trump with us, once that threat is gone we can go back to being adults with differences

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 days ago

Jesse Watters criticize these efforts, claiming they undermine family values.

Mr "Family values" man, Watters, is a Fox hypocrite and stooge.
Watters was married to Noelle Inguagiato from 2009 to 2019, and they have twin daughters. Inguagiato left Watters in October, 2017 after he admitted to cheating on her with DiGiovine.

[-] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 49 points 3 days ago

it's sad that woman have to hide this from their partners. Everyone should be able to vote how they wish without fear of retaliation.

[-] ifItWasUpToMe@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 days ago

I wonder if there’s a trump suppoerter out there somewhere who is deathly afraid to tell his liberal wife. What are the chances guys? 0.01%?

[-] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

High, especially if they're younger. Half of Gen Z and 40% of Millennials have lied about who they vote for in what researchers believe is an attempt to not strain work, familial, or social relationships. 27% Democrats, 24% Republican and I think 20% of Independents.

https://www.axios.com/2024/10/30/election-gen-z-voting-lies?utm=axios_app

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago

I do so love this idea, LOL. The impotent rage of a whole lot of redhat douchenozzles....

[-] style99@lemm.ee 42 points 3 days ago

The convicted rapist and the couch fucker really planted their flag on Toxic Masculinity hill, didn't they?

[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago

The threat from within! /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Juice@midwest.social 21 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Anarchist socialist antifa liberal democrats have infiltrated MAGA, die mad about it

[-] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago

This is how I earned my free gender reassignment coupon.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

They put mine on my 5g chip just like the $5k they give me every month. Thanks Bill Gates!!

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

I mean, I hope they are right, but they seem to be putting an awful lot of faith in the notion that enough women are going to do this in the right zip codes to make a difference.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 30 points 3 days ago

I mean, I don't think this is an official campaign strategy or anything. It's just a trend of women independently realizing the GOP is bad for them and their husbands don't care...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

in a perfect world

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
638 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19159 readers
4473 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS