this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
760 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39011 readers
3517 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and French President Emmanuel Macron held a call to discuss the potential implications of Donald Trump’s return to the U.S. presidency for Europe.

The leaders pledged to strengthen cooperation for a “more united, stronger, more sovereign Europe” in light of this possibility. Macron emphasized a commitment to European sovereignty while maintaining cooperation with the U.S. Additionally, German and French defense ministers plan to meet to coordinate on defense policies.

Trump’s ambiguous stance on Russia’s war in Ukraine and his critical view of NATO burden-sharing raise concerns in Europe about future U.S.-Europe relations.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 293 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You guys better ramp up arms production and switch to a partial wartime stance. Because Russia isn't going to stop with Ukraine.

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Invest in arms companies lol

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 176 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Europe needs to step up on Ukraine. NATO is out of the picture, the EU needs to stand in its place.

[–] Ziggurat@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Europe needs to step up on Ukraine.

Realistically, I doubt the western european public opinions are ready to accept 20 year old kids coming home in a coffin. If we put boots on the ground, I expect the war to be more deadly than recent middle-east operations.

So while we could kick of Russia ass, I don't think we're ready to pay the political price, at least for Ukraine.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 87 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is more about ramping up domestic arms production to fill the gap that is going to come from US production no longer going to Ukraine.

[–] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ironically I think policy support would have been much easier had we put boots on the ground right away. There was initially enormous support for Ukraine, and sending out own soldiers would have given voters a continued vested interest in the war.

Not saying the outcome would have been better, and there is always the threat of nuclear war. However, it would totally changed the course and focus of elections, and my impression is that voters like it when politicians take risks, even if it doesn’t pan out (and even if it’s suicidally stupid).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Western Europe, yep, there's not much appetite for that. Southern, neither, Northern, I wouldn't count them out, Baltics will look to the North, Central (without Germany)... basically the only reason Poland didn't put boots on the ground yet is NATO.

The French might get involved for dignity's sake, but on a backfoot -- special forces, long-range operations. Also sending French MREs is always a good idea.

EDIT: Oh, Italy. Meloni hates Putin's guts, the FDI may go in even without appetite because well the "post" in "post-fascist" doesn't mean that they've got rid of fascists' admiration for war, just the more obvious self-defeating aspects. Struggles of national sovereignty seem to be right up their alley. Greece is too broke either way and Turkey will be on Turkey's side.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago

Lol. Maybe we can drown our enemies in paperwork.

[–] RedstoneValley@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 week ago

That's not entirely correct. While the US is without a doubt the biggest part of (and contributor to) NATO, it consists of a few other nations as well. But you are absolutely right that Europe needs to get their shit together because it is very likely that the US will scale down their NATO involvement

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 117 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump’s ambiguous stance on Russia’s war in Ukraine and his critical view of NATO burden-sharing raise concerns in Europe about future U.S.-Europe relations.

Absolutely nothing ambiguous about it. Everyone knows where he stands. Exactly where every lapdog stands, behind and slightly off to the side of their master.....

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone knows where he stands.

I strongly suspect that isn't true. I think anti-Trump people know where he stands, but I bet a lot of pro-Trump people are about to be in for a big surprise.

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ah, yes....the old "leopards are eating people's faces, but how was I supposed to know that it'd be my face?" bit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago (8 children)

American here.

Please embargo us. Make it clear that you will not work with a fascist state.

I want our economy to be in fucking ruins come 2026, when 20 Republican senators are up for reelection. If we take the house and a 2/3rds majority in the Senate and we can end this shit in January 2027.

But we need the anger and pain the Republicans have tapped into to fuel the fire to wipe the GOP from existence. And we need the Dems to stop playing fair. We need to go scorched-earth on these motherfuckers.

[–] timestatic@feddit.org 28 points 1 week ago

There is no way in which the US will be embargod. Even under trump european nations will try to keep a mostly beneficial relation with the US due to the economic reliability and US strength in global politics. Sorry bud!

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

in fucking ruins

It will somehow just be “the democrats fault” or those pesky brown invaders. And will fire up the base to vote in another shitclown.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

Down economies are the number one predictor of whether a political party will be voted out.

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fuck embargos, invade and liberate us. Return the favor we did for Germany 80 years ago.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No country would be insane enough to embargo the single greatest economic power on Earth.

[–] wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 week ago (4 children)

How can buisness be done with a power so volatile?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 19 points 1 week ago

Simple. Multinational corporate interests have significant influence in the government. The elected officials may change, but people like Charles Koch are still whispering in their ears.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Capitalism.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] soycapitan451@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Close Cooperation with eachother. The USA can no longer be seen as a reliable partner with its wild ideological swings and a lack of strong commitment to the cause.

Make or break for a strong European State.

From a UK perspective we're absolutely fucked due to Brexit. USA is unreliable, detached from the EU, what's left? BRICS? Lol.

Shit.

[–] Notyou@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

BRICS? Lol.

It'd be BRICSUK then. Kinda close to Brexit. Just paint it as the next step after Brexit.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

SUKBRICK sounds like a demeaning act that we brought on ourselves so lets go with that.

[–] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone that voted for Cheeto Christ has willingly put their teeth to the curb, so SUKBRICK isn't far off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The EU needs a centralized military if it wants to survive

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Maybe they need it, but that may not be happening. Over the past decade, Europe has been moving decisively to the right, just like the US is doing, which means less internal European cooperation and a further move toward sovereign nation states. The EU will maybe be able to maintain the overall trade cooperation among countries, but there's very little chance of further European integration in other policy areas as it stands. Even the Schengen open-border cooperation is hanging by a thread.

[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Then the EU will fall and Europe will plunge into a new era of uncertainty and war

[–] Jumi@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's basically what all our history is anyway

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 13 points 1 week ago

Yeah, it's also exactly what the EU and it's predecessors exist to prevent. We've never had a period of prolonged peace in Europe like we have now. And these utter fucking slabs want to undo it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 65 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Summary:

There will be lots of winded and inspired speeches. Nothing will happen, Europe will stay divided while each country seeks advantages on its own for petty short term gains. The populists will continue to gain footholds, and to conquer lands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CEbbinghaus@lemmy.world 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well that's one good thing to come from the election. Best case scenario America just fucks itself over (and not the rest of the world) while giving all of the EU a common enemy to help further strengthen the bonds.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

The bonds are deteriorating beyond repair. This won't be enough. Trump win will embolden the rising far right in EU countries. There's no good thing, I'm afraid. Sorry for my pessimism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] makyo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah no one saw a need for this EIGHT YEARS AGO?!

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 22 points 1 week ago

Some did. Then most were happy to go back to sleep as Biden won in 2020. Trump was ignorantly considered a hiccup instead of the expression of a deeper issue with the US.

As the election today showed so did the US Democrats think things could just continue in the same way. And here we are again.

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 week ago

eight years ago war looked very different

[–] el_eh_chase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I sincerely hope the European powers will overcome their internal politics and the rightward slide many of them seem to be on, and cooperate more closely for the world's sake. I want to be hopeful for the climate and humanity.

Hopefully Canada will stick with Europe rather than the US ideologically, but with how things are going here we seem farther along on our rightward slide.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

If Europe wants to keep the front line east of Ukraine, they better get on that right now. That front line will not stop at the western border.

[–] genXgentleman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I sincerely hope they're ready to hold the world together. Americans have screwed ourselves.

[–] Mrkawfee@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

One of the few things that you can rely on is the Europeans will provide no unity or leadership.

[–] angrystego@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

They're not. They're ready to screw themselves as well.

[–] Myxomatosis@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Get ready for Donnie to epically suck Putin’s cock. Fuck, I hate this country.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He'll start buying russian natural resources at a dollar on the dime and gas prices will drop a little bit and all the dumb idiots that voted for him will drool and smile because "ooga booga feels good" while he pulls out of nato and the world marches towards WWIII

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 week ago

Not needing help from America would be great if our own governments weren't filled with fascists.

[–] Nihilistra@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Try to give some nukes to every eastern border country.

Poland already said they'll get the bomb asap. Not like we have anything to lose.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sanctiones. You need to issue sanctions against the US. Please.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] superkret@feddit.org 8 points 1 week ago

It's the same boiler-plate statement they release after every US election.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Oh good, last time fascism rose in the west they were at each other’s throats

load more comments
view more: next ›