990
submitted 1 year ago by UhBell@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Duke_Nukem_1990@feddit.de 52 points 1 year ago

OP will be real dangerous when he learns fish also don't ask for consent.

[-] pazukaza@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

They don't? I've been wasting my time.

[-] Pagliacci@lemmy.ml 45 points 1 year ago

Agreed, if a bear can eat a person why can't I eat a person?!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] artaxthehappyhorse@lemmy.ml 33 points 1 year ago

By this logic, is it fair game to eat people who eat animals?

[-] do_not_pm_me@thelemmy.club 8 points 1 year ago

Only humans that eat other humans.

[-] Zeppo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Why can't i eat humans who are "OH YEAH ya'll dawg i shot A BEAR YEAH!!" and then didn't eat it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Something needs to die for you to survive, what and how much is up to your individual tolerance for input/output ratio.

Death and suffering is a natural state of being in nature. I can reduce it, but I still need to survive.

I hate fishing. I don't need to fish in my current station. If I did, I would fish.

[-] Zozano@aussie.zone 43 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Pretty common misconception about vegan ideology. Vegans don't think people in developing nations have a moral imperative to change their ways because they don't have an alternative.

I don't need to eat meat, so I don't.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] SQL_InjectMe@partizle.com 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yup that’s why I still buy clothes from sweatshops with kids working in them.

In all seriousness you’re right, but I believe people have a much lower tolerance than they think they do, but they just avoid thinking about it

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] BachenBenno@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago

The difference is that the fish needs to eat the other fish. We don't need ANY animal products. So every killed animal suffered and lost their life for 10min of taste for us that we didn't need. Being vegan is so easy in 2023.

[-] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

taste

what about vitamins? proteins and other nutrients

like omega 3 fatty acid majorly found in fishes

[-] agoseris@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago

There are plenty of plant sources of Omega 3. Flax seeds, walnuts, soybeans, and canola oil all have decent amounts of omega 3 in them. As for protein, legumes generally have a bunch.

Really, the only thing a vegan needs to supplement is B12, but even that gets added to a bunch of stuff like breakfast cereals and plant milks if you consume those.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Azathoth@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

You can take them as supplements. It's the same for your body. Oh and you are already doing that, because they give supplements to the animals they raise and kill, we are just eliminating the middleman.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (34 replies)
[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You consider humans superior in intellect and ability compared to all other animals yet can't grasp the fact that some humans have chosen to use said superior intellect and ability to avoid killing other animals?

[-] s_s@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

You consider humans superior in intellect and ability compared to all other animals

Does he?

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Isn't that usually the argument that anti-vegans use? That we're the top predator due to our intelligence and technology and therefore we have an intrinsic right to the lives of other animals?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HaleEndGrad@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fish eating fish doesn't lead to ecological disturbance. Humans have put multiple species on the verge of extinction.

[-] 4ce@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago
[-] wurosh@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Hold on, the link you posted says 10 to 100 times more than the natural background extinction rate. That's very far from "any of the previous mass extinctions in the history of the Earth.

[-] 4ce@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, it says

100 to 1,000 times higher than the background extinction rate

both in the general intro and in the "Extinction rate" section, and

10 to 100 times higher than in any of the previous mass extinctions in the history of Earth

in the "Extinction rate" section (both verbatim quotes from its first sentence).

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I’m not on either side of the argument, but would guess a good argument would be that fish need to eat other fish in order to survive as it’s their only source of food. We don’t. Provenly.

[-] Indie@lemmy.fmhy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

What's wrong with fish eating plastics we dump in the waters. Are they anti plastic or something?????

/S

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[-] tweeks@feddit.nl 17 points 1 year ago

As far as value goes, I don't particularly value my own life or that of a fish. I do value the suffering of both while living though, as in I want to minimise that as much as possible.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] chase_what_matters@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Can someone explain this template to me?

[-] UhBell@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I'm afraid that's classified information

[-] Relected@lemmy.kya.moe 5 points 1 year ago

SJ Voice: The fuck you mean classified?!? Motherfucker?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chickerino@feddit.nl 15 points 1 year ago

Buy a man eat fish, he day, teach fish man, to a lifetime

[-] Vespair@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

Build a man a campfire and he's warm for the night; set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life

[-] django@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 1 year ago

How come fish can eat their own offspring but we can't do the same to ours?

[-] jtmetcalfe@lemmy.fmhy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

You know who’s not talking about the value of a fish’s life? Fish

[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I suppose it was only a matter of time before the vegans vs meat eaters oozed on over from Reddit.

[-] where_am_i@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

You can, greg. But with that type of reasoning, you're also just a fish. And this is not a compliment, greg

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 year ago

I learned from Nirvana that it's okay to eat fish, 'cause they don't have any feelings.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
990 points (90.6% liked)

Memes

45546 readers
885 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS