this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Jellyfin: The Free Software Media System

5834 readers
2 users here now

Current stable release: 10.10.3

Community Standards

Website

Forum

GitHub

Documentation

Feature Requests

Matrix (General Information & Help)

Matrix (Announcements)

Matrix (General Development)

Matrix (Off-Topic) - Come get to know the team and blow off steam!

Matrix Space - List of all the available rooms on Matrix.

Discord - Bridged to our Matrix rooms

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I used to have a jellyfin server on an old desktop but now my only spare computer is a raspberry pi. It should be able to install the app but would a raspberry pi 3b+ actually be able to run a jellyfin server at a usable level? I'll probably mainly use it for CD rips, so it shouldn't be super demanding but the raspberry pi isn't super powerful either. What do y'all think?

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 3 weeks ago

If you aren't relying on transcoding, you're good. I am sure it can handle one or maybe even two streams. Most modern devices can decode H.264 and H.265/HEVC easily, and some even AV1. Watching videos with these codecs on any Smart TV or phone won't give you a hard time.

[–] cyberic@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I have done it for one stream at a time. However, transcoding gave it a hard time. If at all possible I would recommend a Pi 4.

[–] matcha_addict@lemy.lol 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I thought Pi 4 can't do transcoding for jellyfin? Am I mistaken? Or maybe it's only 4K it can't do?

[–] gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 3 weeks ago

the pi 5 lacks hardware transcoding. pi 4 could do it, but it was deprecated by jellyfin.

maybe consider picking up a (used) mini pc instead.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

It doesn't have a proper GPU

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago

If you are getting new hardware get something with a GPU and proper storage. Even a 6 year old desktop will run better.

[–] Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

So it should be ok if it's just going to my phone then?

I'd suggest 1080p downloads as your max resolution. Also setup a VPN running on another device. Should do you fine for a while.

[–] sploosh@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure, it can serve files up to players that can decode them. You're going to be absolutely unable to do any transcoding at all and if you try to serve up anything with a bitrate higher than the network adapter can handle you're gonna have problems. I bailed on using a Pi4 as a jellyfin server and got a chepo N-100 based box off Amazon (BeeLink something something with 2 NICs) for under $250 and haven't looked back.

You might be fine if you're sticking to small files that are handled natively by their players. It only costs your time to try it out.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 weeks ago

Technically yes

Would you want to? It depends

Used a 3b+ for years. I just use the Jellyfin client like the android apps on phone/TV as some videos cause it to struggle in the web player.

[–] a@91268476.xyz 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

@Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world in my experience you can definitely play music and watch movies as long as the client doesn’t need transcoding

[–] Unknown1234_5@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How would I know if the client needs transcoding?

[–] limitedduck@awful.systems 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If the client doesn't support the codec or resolution of the media then it'll need transcoding

[–] CCMan1701A@startrek.website 1 points 3 weeks ago

I found using Kodi helped resolve video codec support in my case. It was for AV1 nlon the Chromecast 4k, which doesn't support AV1, it seems to mostly work for smaller AV1 encodes. I guess it is using software decoding.