this post was submitted on 30 Nov 2024
69 points (98.6% liked)

Canada

7273 readers
356 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

No one wants you to eat bugs.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Big chocolate covered cricket industry in shambles.

(Not really, because if pp is elected people gonna be so broke they're gonna be rationed a daily allotment of grubs)

[–] Noved@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago

And then they will blame it on Trudeau and they will believe it.

[–] Kalcifer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I've never understood the "bug conspiracy". Let's assume that there is a movement of people that wants everyone to eat bugs, and let's ignore any pros or cons about their consumption. How would that affect one's life? Without legislation mandating it's use (which I'd wager would be illegal, anyways β€” unless, ofc, there was a large enough majority of people in a democratic country who are in favor of forcing bugs on everyone to overrule said laws), one couldn't be forced to consume it; those who'd want to consume it will consume it, and those who don't won't. Where exactly is the issue?

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well, after gay marriage was legalized, destroying all heterosexual relationships and forcing us all to take gay partners, this is the obvious next step in the leftist agenda.

[–] lamp@neon.nightbulb.net -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@Sunshine@lemmy.ca

Then: "Let them eat cake."

Now: MAKE them eat cake.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

@lamp@neon.nightbulb.net

I don't understand what I am reading.

[–] lamp@neon.nightbulb.net 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Let them eat cake" is a very old journalist meme about government indifference to the horrible suffering it causes to the impoverished people.

"Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", said to have been spoken in the 18th century by "a great princess" upon being told that the peasants had no bread. The phrase "let them eat cake" is conventionally attributed to Marie Antoinette, although there is no evidence that she ever uttered it, and it is now generally regarded as a journalistic clichΓ©. The French phrase mentions brioche, a bread enriched with butter and eggs, considered a luxury food. The quote is taken to reflect either the princess's frivolous disregard for the starving peasants or her poor understanding of their plight.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Let/_them/_eat/_cake

Like many other memes and political slogans, it is falsely attributed to someone who actually didn't say it.

So we have gone from, "Let them eat cake" to "Make them eat cake [bugs]" as a political meme used by journalists and agitators to promote an agenda of faux resistance.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -1 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I am aware of where it comes from, I was saying YOU didn't understand what you were reading.

I can see now what my mistake was.

[–] lamp@neon.nightbulb.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I grant you absolution my son.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don’t understand what I am reading.

I don't see the word you in that statement

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Thats because it was in first person as I assumed you wanted to say...

You still seem to have problems with comprehension.

[–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm not @lamp

You might want to check usernames when you're trolling

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca -2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Nah, you hoped into this of your own accord on their bullshit, so you get the same brush.