this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
899 points (98.6% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3894 readers
1088 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I get not liking Discovery, but do people really think Lower Decks, SNW, Picard are “Woke?”

Also, obviously, sci-fi is at its best when tackling politics… Isn’t that kinda the point?

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's woke because they're so unhinged that basic human decency is woke now.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 1 points 1 day ago
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 3 points 1 day ago

Yep, snw and picard get 'woke' complaints. LD they tend to just attack for being animated

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Woke" has long since lost its original meaning.

Used to mean something positive and progressive. Then it meant something that tried writing itself off as something progressive, but was simply stupid and entitled (i.e. That Batwoman series), now it's anything a right winger hates, even if it isn't trying to be progressive in any way.

Truth is, with NuTrek, it doesn't have a single progressive bone in its body, and the writers don't have the skill to pull off any sort of commentary.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Truth is, with NuTrek, it doesn’t have a single progressive bone in its body, and the writers don’t have the skill to pull off any sort of commentary.

It’s not that bad, though I don’t totally disagree.

Also… I’d argue a problem is having their hands tied. Ironically, anything that would hit really hard couldn’t be aired in this day and age. The whole franchise would probably be mothballed if they pushed the envelope as hard as TOS.

[–] RamenJunkie@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

SNW has like 90% female crew members. Also the pilot lady has short hair. Therefore woke.

Probably.

I havent gotten past the original series yet (I started with that), so far Star Trek seems like the entire point is to get into complex social and political issues that other companies would be too scared to cover.

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

https://youtube.com/watch?v=QFspemhHmsw A Critique of Star Trek Discovery — Part 1 #RIPStarTrek

This whole essay is worth listening to, but 15:46-30:33 in particular gets at the heart of a big reason why classic Trek rocks and why nuTrek is shit.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Lower Decks remains very good. CBS has tried to pivot Star Trek from Sci-Fi to Space Adventure, and that's been ugly. But not every series they've spun out took that tone.

Also Orville - particularly the latest season - has been incredible. Everything Star Trek is supposed to be.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Lower Decks remains very good.

It's finished. The final episode aired last week.

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Also Orville - particularly the latest season - has been incredible. Everything Star Trek is supposed to be.

That show surprised the hell out of me, especially because the first season has more of Seth's typical touch, but then he drops some of the silliness and dives right into being a Trek replacement. It feels like every episode or two has some powerful commentary and things don't always go the way you think they should because situations are more complex than simply right-or-wrong... Like old Trek.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

I am still bummed Lower Decks is over. Great finale, and I'm glad they wrapped up the story nicely. My only complaint is to Paramount not giving us more seasons.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Nichelle Nichols was at one point thinking of quitting the show but stayed because MLK Jr. himself told her how important her character was.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

And without Nichelle Nichols on Star Trek, she wouldn't have been hired by NASA and then we wouldn't have had Sally Ride, so she is a legitimate space hero.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 53 points 2 days ago (1 children)

“Shatner figured it out? Shatner? This is a real low point. Yeah, this one hurts.”

[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 29 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"When I have a problem that phasers can't solve, I just kiss a beautiful alien. Then suddenly, I have a completely different problem!" - Jason Tiberius Kirk

Edit: I may have drifted into the Kelvin timeline...

[–] showmeyourkizinti@startrek.website 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

“I'm a legit snack” - Nyota Uhura

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 83 points 2 days ago (20 children)

Guaranteed if original Star Trek came out today, it would be decried as "woke" and "DEI" and there would be outrage over it from the usual culture warriors.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just out of curiosity, what do you think is more progressive: a spaceship where all female crew is forced to wear miniskirts, a bridge crew that has exactly one woman, the part in the pilot where "Orion sex slaves" are introduced in the horniest possible way, or the married producer who was cheating on his wife with the only two relevant female cast members?

The 1960s was a long time ago. While there are a lot of TOS that aged very well, the idea that the show would be decried as woke is straight up delusional.

[–] graff@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not to be that guy, but in the 60s, mini skirts were considered an empowerment. It was the beginning of the sexual revolution after all. In contemporary times it won't be a miniskirt, it would be something else.

When people say "if star trek were made today" they don't mean time travelling Roddenberry, studio, and crew to today without changes. They mean creating star trek to today to tackle contemporary issues.

[–] hesusingthespiritbomb@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Cow pies. "Original Star Trek" clearly referred to TOS.

If OC meant a modern rendition of classic trek, they wouldn't be speaking in hypotheticals. They'd just refer to SNW by name.

[–] graff@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the hypothetical scenario that I presented, star trek never existed and was created for the first time in contemporary times.

Strange New Worlds doesn't fit in this discussion because star trek was already created in 1966 and this is a prequel/spin-off of that series

So by "original Star Trek" you're actually referring to a fundamentally different series. This hypothetical version of Star Trek magically keeps everything you like about it, while shedding anything problematic or downright bad.

The lengths anyone on this site will go to avoid admitting that they made a stupid hot take comment is wild.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (10 children)

They didn’t have everything figured out back then. For one, they bullied Spock for what we could only describe today as his neurodiversity.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 30 points 2 days ago (4 children)

The message I got from McCoy was that humans got along because they found new people to be racist against instead of each other

That's a simple enough message to even get it from Warhammer 40k - Gender? Skin colour? Disabilities? Doesn't matter, pick up a Lasrifle and start shooting xenos

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›