Bluesky

Conservapedia exists, and it's every bit the wild ride you imagine.

WiXi 🥴

I absolutely condone violence, and while I shall only attempt to harm Elon Musk by not purchasing any of his companies' products, if I were to read on one of Lemmy's news communities that someone had, let's say, shotgunned all of Elon's entrails out, I'm pretty sure I would respond by laughing myself into a state of acute respiratory distress.

I'd give the person who killed him a fucking alibi.

I dont condone violence

Depends on the recipient. Oligarchs like Musk enact a widespread and constant barrage of violence against the entire planet. If some -absolute hero- were to kill him, the violence needed to kill him would barely qualify as rounding error compared to the violence that would be put to an end by doing so.

That's why so many people cheered when the UHC CEO was dropped - it's not a celebration of death or violence, or bloodlust, or even revenge; but relief at the sudden reduction of evil we were all gifted.

So... not condoning violence against people like Musk is supporting a much broader and more sinister type of violence.

It's far worse than that, he's a Libertarian Ayn Randian's idea of someone with merit.

Same. Streisand effect I guess.

Me too, been putting it off for a while, but the internet needs to be protected from this awful mf

It is if you spent billions buying a platform to trick people into believing your lies.

Left wingers USED to use the word "Woke", early on it basically meant what "Based" means now, but then it was co-opted by the right.

Woke as in "Awoken to the reality of the situation"

Because directly citing Wikipedia isn't how you're supposed to use it in that sort of setting. What Wikipedia is best-suited for in actual research is being a first stop:

• Get some basic understanding of the subject via the lead section.
• Potentially get some idea on if this subject has plenty of information about it before choosing to write about it (e.g. if you're writing a high school or undergraduate essay, you probably want a topic that has a wealth of information about it, not to spend weeks trawling through archives trying to find whatever scraps you can).
• Edit: Because we try to make technical articles highly accessible, the way an article is written can also give you some idea if a subject is way out of your depth by seeing if you can even follow along with what it's saying. This is important because a) it makes writing easier and b) there's less risk of close paraphrasing when you understand a subject enough to put things into your own words.
• Find what's hopefully a wealth of decent sources that will introduce you properly to the subject.
• Give you leads for what to search for elsewhere by giving you some key pieces of information about the subject.

I would even say that professionally written encyclopedias like Britannica aren't really a good "end source" that you should be citing. You absolutely can use Wikipedia for homework, but you still need to have some basic understanding of how to evaluate the sources that Wikipedia uses. Essentially, we ideally give you a head-start, not a finish line.

You shouldn't use any encyclopedia, wiki or otherwise. They're too surface level for the information you would want to include in any kind of report.

It's great to use for finding a bunch of sources you can cite, however.

Everyone is responding to you why you shouldn't be using Wikipedia anyways for homework, and I wholeheartedly agree that it's a great starting point but not a great finishing point, but I'll give you a hint as to how you can use it for your homework 😉.

Find your topic in Wikipedia and find a tidbit of information that you want to use on your paper or whatever. Wikipedia should have sources, so find the source of the thing you want to use.

That source now has the information you want to use and much more! That should be citable for your homework!