If he was Republican they'd be sending him donations to fight the "woke mob" deep state
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
274 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19089 readers
3806 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Probably what he could do. Just switch parties become a Republican say the woke mob is after him and Republicans will vote in droves for him. Plus give Republicans the majority.
Best just to out him in 2024 regardless if he can be convicted our not. He will not resign lets just hope he don't go traitor too.
The Senate can expel him with a 2/3 vote. Which they should do.
I realize this is a high bar these days, but if a senator can be bought, they shouldn't be in the senate. And that should be a low bar.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
“The alleged facts are so serious that they compromise the ability of Senator Menendez to effectively represent the people of our state,” Murphy, a Democrat, said in a statement.
And the senator was defiant against the charges in a statement, calling the investigation “an active smear campaign of anonymous sources and innuendos to create an air of impropriety where none exists.”
“The charges laid out against Senator Menendez today go against everything we should believe as public servants,” New Jersey General Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin said in a statement.
In separate statements, Democratic Reps. Andy Kim, Josh Gottheimer, Bill Pascrell and Donald Norcross also called for the senator to resign, saying the seriousness of the charges will make it difficult for him to serve the state.
“I have unwavering confidence in my father and his dedication to the New Jerseyans who he has relentlessly fought for in his long career as a public servant,” said Robert Menendez, a New Jersey Democrat.
In 2015, he was charged with conspiracy, bribery and honest services fraud relating to allegedly abusing the power of his office as part of a relationship with a wealthy ophthalmologist.
The original article contains 1,092 words, the summary contains 191 words. Saved 83%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Vast majority of Washington politicians are corrupt, this idiot just had to flaunt his corruption with gold bars and is now paying the price…
Yes, the entire system is corrupt and lots of politicians behave in a manner that makes me furious that their actions are actually totally legal within this system. This guy, however, is pathological. He was somehow cleared of federal corruption charges just a couple of years ago.
If somebody resigns it should trigger a snap election, not an appointment...
When elections are every couple of years, it's easier to appoint someone in the interim instead of the logistics of having a new election for one individual seat.
Counter-point: elections shouldn't be so complicated that you can't perform a snap election on short notice. Other countries do it.
Do you have any idea just how much goes into an election? Those other countries also don't have the population we do. The candidates need time to make their case and if the next election cycle is only a few months out then there is no reason to not wait. Plenty of seats go empty, not all seats need filled asap.
"yeah but think of how much WORK that would be..."
You aren't wrong, I'm just saying it's a bad argument for those in charge.
It's not about work for the ones in charge. There is more to an election like giving the candidates time to make their case for being elected. When another full election is right around the corner it makes way more sense to wait. Depending on the seat and what that person does, we may not even need someone appointed, plenty of seats go empty for long lengths of time.
I do see where you're coming from, and to an extent I agree with you. Why bother with an election when the next one is 6 months away.
But when it's several YEARS, it becomes an issue. A lot can happen in 30 seconds, let alone a year or more.
In that case, it makes sense to require them to put any appointed positions up for election at the next regularly scheduled election. There's an election every two years at most. Many states have elections every year.
More like how expensive that is. Seems like a waste of money when the next election is often months away. And will happen either way.
I think a lot of countries with snap elections don't just do it for a single position, and it resets the whole parliamentary term.