316
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dojan@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

"The market regulates itself."

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

Survival of the fittest!*

*Richest with the least amount of ethics.

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The amount of ethics of any leader is irrelevant in capitalism. The system itself demands the creation of monopolies and constant growth. If you try to be a good person, some other company will “win the race” and take you out of the competition one way or another.

Expecting or demanding ethics of people is trying to fix the wrong problem, while the solution is toppling the entire system.

[-] cactus@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago
[-] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 year ago

I’m an Apple customer but this is straight up wrong. Non-compete clauses this broad are ridiculous and practically stop ex-employees working anywhere they’re actually skilled to work. It quite literally ends someone’s career after their tenure.

If you’re expertise is SoC design and implementation, to be contractually restricted from working anywhere else that does SoC-related business is effectively kicking you out of the very industry and job pool you’re capable of working. Your mobility is totally stifled.

These kinds of restrictive covenants need to be outlawed or at least be limited to a short time frame no more than six months, requiring ex employers to pay the ex employee during this time if made redundant or fired or requiring the incumbent employer to pay the new employee during this time until they’re legally able to work again.

Hopefully this case goes against Apple favour and sets a strong precedent against absurd non compete clauses like this.

[-] Asymptote@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 year ago

In Denmark, non compete clauses like these require the old employer to pay you for the period you're not allowed to compete.

[-] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

Darn that Denmark and its sensible employment laws and strong economy (especially considering GDP per capita).

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Non-compete clauses should be illegal (or done like in Denmark, like the example of our fellow commenter here)

[-] CoffeeAddict76@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They’re illegal in the province I live in. They were all voided a few years ago.

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They're illegal in the country I live in. I mostly meant they should be illegal basically everywhere.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago

“Enormous corporation behaves like an enormous corporation”

[-] shami@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I was about to say. Basically like every massive corporation these days

[-] Norgur@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago

Water is wet, I guess

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

Not Apple, any big business. Are you new to capitalism little one?

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Was going to say, fuck Apple, but if you think they’re alone in this, you are obscenely naive

[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

we can still say fuck apple

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] set_secret@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

you're were 'going to say' but your 'going' preface implied that you didn't actually, even though you did write the text 'fuck apple'. semantics, however I don't think we should ever miss an opportunity to say fuck apple. Fuck Apple.

upon re reading your text I now understand you were using the term 'going to say' in a colloquial sense not a literal one, so I misinterpreted the comment sry.

[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 year ago

Well, are the other ones accused?

[-] dynamojoe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe not in this article but this is a perpetual accusation for just about any large and successful corporation to deal with. Using "Apple" gets headlines, but you've probably read similar accusations against Alphabet, Microsoft, Epic, EA, John Deere, etc....

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it goes back to Rockefeller and Standard Oil. Buy or squash competition until you are the only one standing. Certainly Bill Gates did this and quite aggressively at times.

[-] Nogami@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Any big company that doesn’t do this is doing it wrong. You may not like it but that’s the way things work. But all big companies will eventually fall given enough time and management changes.

load more comments (31 replies)
[-] yoz@aussie.zone 14 points 1 year ago

Nothing to see here. Apple doing apple things.

[-] brlemworld@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

They killed DarkSky. We need to break up Apple.

[-] moitoi@feddit.de 8 points 1 year ago

Each day, I read people discovering neoliberalism. It amazes me how naive people are.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Buy it or kill it. Every big corp ever.

[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Shocked Pikachu

this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2023
316 points (95.9% liked)

Apple

17443 readers
27 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS