this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2025
154 points (98.1% liked)

News

23730 readers
5044 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 64 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Children are safe now. Mission Accomplished.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 28 points 2 days ago

and speaker johnson. remember that his kid monitors his phone usage and gets alerts when dad goes somewhere 'good'

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

The comment you replied to was dripping so hard with sarcasm that it didn't need a warning sign, kinda like when there is a house on fire, you don't need a warning sign that a house is a blaze.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Honestly, Ive come to think that there is truly no such thing as sarcasm so blatant as for everyone to get that it is sarcasm without being told.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I forget the name, but this is a proven and observable phenomenon.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Ablaze, even.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

dripping so hard with sarcasm

No it's not, lots of Christians is of that exact opinion.
But since you apparently think it's fine to not to use /s because sarcasm is "obvious", I'll just go ahead and assume you were probably being sarcastic.

kinda like when there is a house on fire

Yes yes, now I see how it's EXACTLY like that. Oh no that must definitely have been sarcasm, because it's not at all like that. 🤣🤣🤣

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I went to a church with a friend and more than one guy started talking to me about their porn addiction… it was bizarre

I don’t understand. They wanted my advice and all I could say was just don’t watch it if it bothers them.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

But it's an ADDICTION, they can't help themselves!! They wanted to be told if they pray, then surely Jesus will forgive them.

[–] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 57 points 2 days ago

The party of personal responsibility folks. Unable to filter their own devices or to guide their kids, pass the burden onto a 3rd party.

[–] Mereo@lemmy.ca 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

VPN companies are now very happy.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

XVideos also.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Perhaps the easiest way to evade state age verification laws is by using a VPN to mask a user's location.

Proof no one looks past the 3rd search result.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Proof no one looks past the 3rd search result.

Do you mean third page? Or do people really only do simple searches?

[–] Huckledebuck@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think they're saying that if you look past the first 3 results, then you may find something that isn't blocked.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well shit, I set my VPN to Texas, xnxx and xvideos outrank pornhub if you search porn. Looks like you got to go to the 3rd result to be blocked.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

That makes sense.

[–] Sabata11792@ani.social 6 points 2 days ago

Further research reveals that pornhub is now the 3rd result to 2 unblocked sites. Google solved the problem.

At this point just let the kids into the porn sites. Like for gods sake I'm so fucking tired of this.

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I wonder what percentage of the people involved in passing these laws have investments in the big porn companies that were threatened by PornHub.

[–] Gerudo@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, I'd put more money on they invested in VPN companies, or at the very least, the age verification companies.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Like Rick Scott in Florida trying to (or maybe did) force welfare recipients into drug testing through companies his wife owned - https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/17/us/rick-scott-conflicts-blind-trust.html

Given porn hub's parent company owns pretty much all traditional porn companies, not that many.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

At first I thought "yeah but there are other sites out there." But then it occurred to me that most of people this will affect probably don't know that. And it only escalates with the age of people too.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

XVideos will love this.