this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
231 points (99.6% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The European Union wants elderly people (70+) to undergo medical tests from now on to prove that they are still capable of driving a car every five years. However, the proposal has been met with a lot of criticism.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FarFarAway@lemmy.world 61 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Everyone mentions cognitive abilities, which is also important, but really physical abilities should be tested as well.

Here in america, My 89 y.o. grandmother (at the time) used canes to get around. Got her license renewed just by a written test, no one batted an eye. The fact that she "walked" in was enough and no one saw that she would physically have to pull her leg up to push the brake pedal.

She got into quite a few fender benders after that, and 1 pretty bad accident that totalled her car. That bad accident was responsible for a huge decline in health. She cant drive any longer, but between the insurance and the burden on family to support her ailing health, it all could have been avoided if they required a doctor's signature for renewal.

I do realize that something like this takes away from feeling independent and maintaining autonomy, and i feel for that. It sucks that part of growing old is...well, growing old, but should those emotions outweigh personal and public safety?

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

There was a man who lived on my street who drove way way way into old age. His car was literally covered from front to back in dents. You’d see him walking to his car so slowly it was painful. He’d struggle to get the door open, hop in, and take off. It seemed like he had a new dent every time he came home.

I knew another man though, WWII vet, 98 years old. His wife was 93. He’d come to my store and buy cigars for himself and cigarettes for the wife. He had no issues getting around at all. I was legit shocked when I found out how old he was. His health deteriorated so quickly seemingly out of nowhere and he was still trying to drive, but fortunately his daughter stepped in and put an end to it.

Now his daughter has dementia. One day she stopped in to buy cigarettes for her mom and she asked me if I knew her son. It kind of took me by surprise. I’ve known the whole family for 20 years at this point.

Her son had a serious car accident in the mid 2000s and he’s been in a wheelchair since. He lost both of his legs, half of one of his hands, fingers burned off at the ends on the other. He barely survived.

She was telling me about the accident like it had just recently happened. She was crying, said almost word for word what she’d said to me all those years ago while he was in the hospital. Such a surreal experience.

Next time I seen her she asked me again, β€œDo you know my son?”

Then she tried to pay for her fuel 3 times back to back.

She’s still driving. Everyone knows that she’s experiencing these problems including the local police, but she’s still out there driving around.

[–] JesusChrist@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I feel like this makes for a good argument for adequate public transit in the United States. If elderly people had access to public transit, then they might not feel like they are losing their independence if they can't drive.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's a pretty serious concern here about the mobility and independence of the elderly... but that can't be put over and above public safety. I see either very anxious and hesitant, or completely off with the fairies and uncaring elderly drivers on a frequent basis.

They wouldn't get anywhere near a licence if they had to demonstrate their competence even once more, let alone semi-regularly.

[–] ChrystalBlurbs@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mobility for the eldery IS important but IMHO there should be affordable, easy accessible options without the use of a personal vehicle. Otherwise it get's harder and harder for the eldery to participate in social activities which are beneficiary to mental health and prevent early symptoms of Alzheimers disease.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

Well, indeed, nobody actively wants the elderly to be forced in to solitude and isolation. If anything, the advent of driverless vehicles would be of greatest benefit to them rather than tech bros who want a nap.

[–] cestvrai@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Here in the Netherlands I see a lot of old people being bussed around point-to-point with minibuses. Likely limited to the bigger cities though where there also better normal public transit options.

[–] MaxPower@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Very good. As a german, I'd welcome this.

However, expect heavy pushback from the German automotive industry. They are for Germany what the NRA and weapons manufacturer lobby is to the US.

[–] ElmarsonTheThird@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If a german pensioneer can't drive a german car with more than 250 kph on the german Autobahn from north to south, west to east: how can we have EINIGKEIT UND RECHT UND FREIHEIT?

/s

[–] Ravi@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

You are missing this: !!!1111

[–] JVT038@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Does the German automotive industry also exercise immense power and influence in both politics and society?

[–] Naeron@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

That's a solid "Yes, definitely!"

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Germany is unbelievably car-centric for a developed country. It's also nicely planned, so most of the time you can survive pretty well without a car, but car is still the king here

[–] Onionizer@geddit.social 4 points 1 year ago

When the idea of a general speed limit was proposed, people were literally screeching "but muh freedom!!!"

[–] jannis@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Germany has more cars per capita than the US and Germany is the only country without a speedlimit on motorways. So yes, they definitely do

[–] Randomguy27@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jannis@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Looks like you're right, I heard this fact in a YouTube video or something and didn't check against. I'm sorry, I don't want to spread misinformation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Loui@feddit.de 25 points 1 year ago

If they would do that we would finally get a strong lobby for decent public transport!

[–] MrMcMisterson@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good, I completely agree with this. Maybe once they hit 80, every year.

[–] Nerandza@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why 80 years old even needs to drive? Their reflexes are slow, their vision is bad, their hearing is catastrophic. Why just dont let someone drive them/use taxi/public transport?

[–] jimmy@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree but for that we would need good and inexpensive public transport

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Also walkable neighbourhoods where the grocery store is always close enough that most days, elderly people won't really NEED any transport.

A bus stop 400 meters away is nice, but you know what is nicer? The grocery store being 300 meters away.

Of course there's still doctors appointments and such, but that's where public transport can still step in and help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ugetsu@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good Idea. It's widely accepted that cognitive capabilities can decline rapidly with old age. It simply makes no sense that a person that needs 8 tries and 10 minutes to change the station on their TV is still allowed to operate a two ton death machine without any checks in place.

The important part here is to make it so that it ONLY "catches" declined driving capabilities and is not also biased in terms of social and financial status or maybe if you're an immigrant or something.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reaction speed in particular.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phreak@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is quite a brilliant idea. Although we could argue that everyone of all ages should be somewhat tested every x years. The amount of people that are over confident and forget things on the road is quite scary.

[–] Pika@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I kind of agree with this, I do think that an exam should be done every so many years, but I don't think that full on driving test should need to be done. At most maybe a minimal test like make sure you can still do intersections fine and make sure you still know how to use your blinker in Etc but honestly I don't feel like a full-on test is going to be beneficial for anything, a timed exam with common sense questions such as who has the right away in this situation, or when is it appropriate to go through a yellow, basic stuff

In the case of the eu, this isn't an actually a driving test; it is more so of a medical test so like vision and memory tests to verify that you still have situational awareness, which I think will do tremendously more then your standard driving test where you may not even hit a situation that requires a lot of situational awareness

[–] SoaringDE@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

In my opinion it should be doctor every 5 years, driving test every 10. And as you get significantely older both intervals get reduced.

I don’t think that full on driving test should need to be done

A full on driving test should be done at least once though. Where I live (Pennsylvania), the "driving test" is basically going around the block and then parallel parking one time. In no sense can it be considered as a comprehensive test of a driver's command of a wide range of potential situations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mininux@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Honestly seeing how people drive ~10 years after getting their licence I think we need a kind of test every 10 years, not necessarily because of declining cognitive capacity but just generally forgetting about safety

although it would be pretty expensive to check absolutely everyone

[–] Mr_Dr_Oink@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I agree with this except im too cynical to believe people just forget about safety. People learn to pass the test and then drive how ever the hell they like. Granted alot of people are safe but i see far too many people just completely disregarding anyone else on the road and their only goal is to get to the front of the line as fast as possible and screw everone else.

They can retake their test, they will drive safely and carefully that one day and then go right back to being selfish idiots.

I would maybe go as far as to say thst there is a requirement to have a black box installed in all cars that gets switched off/removed after a number of years of safe driving. And if you drive badly or unsafely then your insurance goes up every year until you prove you are safe.

Maybe it goes up by x amount Β£100 or like 10% or 20% a year until you stop driving badly but remains at the price it was when you start driving safe for 3 years before dropping back down to the price it would be without the increases you incurred. That would stop people from trying to cheat the system.

It may be extreme but if you are driving safely you have nothing to worry about.

Of course we would have to nail down exactly what counts as unsafe driving so it wasnt overly/unjustly critical.

I mean.... maybe its a bad idea. But again. If its not you then you needn't be worried.

[–] brainrein@feddit.de 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here in Germany your insurance fee goes down every year you don’t cause an accident. But if you cause an accident it will go up again.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ezmack@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. Old people will tolerate a terrifying number of medical problems before going to a doctor

[–] _xDEADBEEF@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

My father has heart + breathing problems causing him to randomly get dizzy+out of breath whilst sitting down doing nothing. We've told him he shouldn't be driving but he says he knows what he's doing as he's been driving for over 60yrs. We reported him to the DVLA because he's going to kill someone.

[–] FleetingTit@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, please make it happen! There was a subreddit called /r/RentnerFahrenInDinge (pensioners driving into things) that was full of new articles of elderly people being completely clueless in traffic.

[–] windowsphoneguy@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

!rentnerfahrenindinge@feddit.de done

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Jomn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This would be great. We should also require all drivers to pass small exams every ~10 years in order to assert that they are up to date with new laws and new types of infrastructure.

load more comments (2 replies)

Yeah this is really good. My wives grandfather is still allowed to drive, but I wouldnt go anywhere near him when hes driving.

[–] nekat_emanresu@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Medical tests?? bleh. Driving is driving, health is health. All drivers should have a to retake basic driving tests at an increasing rate until by the age of 70 where it maxes out at once per 5 years or something.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I wish we could test for cognitive ability for voting access over 70.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Facelikeapotato@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This sounds totally reasonable, maybe the time frame is even a little too long for people over 80. Like it or not, your body, sight, reflexes etc do change.

[–] Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

My country has this system, and at the check the doctor also can determine how often you need to take a check.

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί