BartsBigBugBag

joined 1 year ago
[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 32 points 11 months ago

The indigenous Taiwanese peoples were subject of multiple genocides, at the hands of the Japanese, and then later the Kuomintang. I don’t think they were ever really asked for their opinion on the matter.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 11 months ago

Thanks boss, I appreciate it.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

That link won’t load for me, can you post the direct link in addition to the alternative link in the main body?

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 11 months ago

I think you vastly overestimate how many people buy new cars. Most new cars are bought by the same group of people year after year. Almost 75% of cars purchased in America yearly are used. It’s really only a specific class of people who can afford to buy new cars. It is not the norm.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I mean, if you’re well off enough to buy a $30k car, you’re better off than most Americans anyway. What about those of us that couldn’t afford that, and instead are faced with the choice of taking out exploitative loans and paying for years, or keeping our high mileage, high MPG vehicles?

It seems there’s an assumption that everyone eventually has to buy a new car, but that’s not true. I can count the number of people in my life who have ever bought a new car on one hand. The rest rely on old junkers they replace every couple years because $2000/2yrs is significantly more affordable for someone in poverty than $30,000+ in one year, or $500/mo payments for 5.

Like for me, I spend $30/mo on gas. That’s it. I spend about $25/yr on oil changes, I spend $75/every 2 years on emissions. I’d have to save a hell of a lot more than just gas and upkeep costs to save even a single dollar, and even then I’m definitively losing money over just keeping my car because I will have to pay payments for years because I don’t have the money to buy a new car outright. Personally, I will never buy a new car, nor take a loan for Car, so that puts EVs even further out of my reach. Wheres the $5-10k EVs that are present in much of the world? I don’t want a 16” tv in my dash, or heated seats, or a vision system, or rain sensing windows. I want a bare bones car, with no luxuries, for as cheap as possible, that is as efficient as possible. My 15 year old Corolla is better than the majority of modern cars available in my country in nearly every respect that is meaningful to me than any EVs available for sale in my country, every way except emissions. Unfortunately, my economic security takes priority over individualist attempts to address climate change.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I spend $30/month on gas. Electricity is gonna have to get a whoooole lot cheaper to justify at minimum $30,000 to purchase an EV. Maybe if we get rid of some of the protectionism and allow Chinese $10k EVs into the US I’d consider it. An oil change once a year over the course of owning a car is less than $1000… it costs $25 to do yourself, $50 to have someone else do it. That’s… not a significant cost for even the poorest of people.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The guy he reposted is a literal cult member, of a cult they still glorifies foot binding and is known worldwide for spreading lies about China. Literal cult member. Of a cult implicated in trafficking. Not taking the video down would be the bigger piece of shit move. Don’t promote cultists.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf -1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (9 children)

What does a modern car get me over my 15 year old Corolla as far as reliability? Idk if I really need something that lasts longer, to be honest. I’ve put less than $1000 in this car other than wear items like tires in 15 years, and it cost less than $16k off the lot brand new. A new car would have to get like double the mileage or last a million miles without breaking down to be significantly better than mine, and it would have to be significantly better, because it’s going to cost significantly more even if I get the absolute cheapest cars on the market in their case trim.

[–] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 4 points 11 months ago

Because it fits nearly every single clause in the UN convention on genocide? Because Israeli officials have admitted on national tv they intend to create “a second nakba”? Because they’re using dehumanizing language to describe Palestinians? Because they’ve admitted their goal is to take over Gaza? Because they’re violently attacking hundreds of people in the West Bank, where Hamas has no presence? Because it is by definition a genocide, and apologia like yours does nothing but try to push people into genocide denial.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
180
history rule (lemmy.tf)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1912_Lawrence_textile_strike

Goals: 54-hour week, 15% increase in wages, double pay for overtime work, and no bias towards striking workers

 

There is a tendency currently within corporate structures to focus on metaphysical conceptions, such as “energy” and “magic”.

It is my belief that this integration is a result of the cooption of the metaphysical by the corporations in light of the collapse of centrally organized religions.

With the loss/decline of community minded religion, a void was left within the wider population which reasserted its existence, further atomizing those already disaffected and alienated from themselves and their community by the perversity of the private property and capitalist models. Marx once said that religion is the opiate of the masses, this is often misunderstood as his stating that religion is an addictive drug, but in fact, opium at the time was a lifesaving medical wonder, and as such, religion is the opiate of the masses, to my reading, refers to the use of religion to stave off the pain caused by the alienation of the proletariat by the capitalist order.

Thus, it is my belief that the modern corporate structure with its focus on the metaphysical and attempt to integrate “community” into the inherently anti-communal structure that is the privately owned corporation, is a way of an attempt to repurposeing the necessity for an opiate in a way that enforces and entrenches the capitalist order. Through the creation and maintenance of hierarchically organized false community, they are able to shape the overall narrative surrounding themselves, and are able to drive the development and progression of community values society-wide in a way that furthers their interests and negates the best interests of the proletariat working class.

This development is a natural response for owners, executives, and investors as the proletariat reawakens to the inherently exploitative nature of private property relations and wage labor, and the long slumbering labor movement begins to reawaken. By enshrining the profit motive into the conception of community, and ensuring that workers are kept in a constant state of precarious balance(see: The Precariat), without time to personally develop an understanding of community as it exists naturally without corporate direction, the dominant narrative within a society can be driven to where even the remaining familial and communal bonds can become corrupted by capitalist rhetoric.

It is my belief that this instilling of self-exploitation into individuals has contributed to and allowed for the rise of inherently anti-communal concepts such as “hustle culture”, the monetization of hobbies, etc.

By tying impossible metaphysical conceptions such as “magic” and “energy” into corporate structures, corporations are able to essentially become proselytizing pastors preaching a fiery rhetoric of infinite growth in the face of hard environmental limits, while minimizing the inherent cognitive dissonance one feels in the knowledge that one’s own actions contribute directly to the compounding crises of the current era. when confronted with obvious logical fallacies by building “faith” within the working class.

This faith allows enough space for the corporate owners to push growth in ways that inherently damage the environment and working class, because when one relies upon faith, we are unable to logically examine things, and readily visible trends(such as that towards increasingly authoritarian hierarchies society-wide) become masked behind “the bigger picture”. It also serves to minimize dissent among the employees at a corporation, as those who come to believe in the faith-based ideology espoused by the corporation will react negatively to having their faith bubble popped, and can lash out in order to protect their identity, which, through ideological capture has become tied to their employer. Through time, this system will self-reinforce, as the corporation encourages blind faith, and punishes critical examination of the corporations claims, eventually, the corporation will be primarily those who have fully accepted the ideological basis which was forced upon them from above, and those individuals, having as said before, tied their identity to their corporation, will work in tandem with the corporation against their fellow workers in order to minimize cognitive dissonance and maintain their delusions of community.

One can hardly fault the individuals who fall for this rhetoric, as individuals themselves have limited resources and time to educate themselves on the underlying ideologies of the owner class within the society, while corporations and government, with their monopoly on the media, and levers of power, have nearly unlimited resources through which to push their ideology upon the people.

Through the position imposed upon the proletariat, termed by some the Precariat, in which one is precariously balanced above a pit of suffering, we are forced into a constant state of fight or flight, of survival. When one is in such a state, science has shown, pro-social behaviors such as empathy become more difficult to perform, as one is risking possible harm to themselves by going against the popular grain. By keeping people in this state of fear, they can spread their ideology nearly unchecked. The poor man looks down on the homeless man not because he hates him, but because he knows that he is only a run of bad luck away from becoming one himself, and the cognitive dissonance of being in such a position is so pernicious that people will reject the evidence of their eyes and ears in order to minimize their own suffering, even if that is directly at the expense of others.

 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›