The Left
Oh, sweetheart...
Buttermilk
joined 1 year ago
Yeah that is generally the conclusion folks come to when they see the flaws of the system they live in, while also knowing very little of communism.
He predicts Harris will win citing 8 keys he uses:
No primary contest and the party is largely behind her
No sizable third party spoil
In the short term and long term economies are good
Biden made large policy changes like Paris accords, chips act, inflation reduction act
No sustained social unrest
No meaningful white house scandals
Challenger charisma is limited to a narrow base
The points against her are:
Midterm gains by challengers
Harris isn't the incumbent
With Foreign policy failures and Foreign policy success left unchecked because she passed the majority of the keys.
With those last two he says "The Biden administration is deeply invested in the war in Gaza. Which is a humanitarian disaster, with no end in sight"
Certainly seems like change in the attitude and maybe a change in actions, but listening to more of the speech it doesn't sound quite as radical as these two little snippets might suggest.
Still, it's hard to be worse than Biden on Palestine, and this signals maybe her administration will give a least slightly less than full impunity to Netanyahu.
Seems like you just have an axe to grind about fat people. Protein is not the deciding factor in weight gain, calories are, so I don't know why you think a link to the wiki page about obesity would be convincing that protein powder is snake oil.
Even when you coincide that it is relevant you dismiss with little justification. Also BMI is not a great metric for individuals, many that have a lot of muscle are measured as overweight because there is a lot more to bodies that height and mass.
Can you justify why protein powder is snake oil in line with the other things in the thread? I will grant that most people have more than enough protein in a regular diet, but stats about obesity says literally nothing about if powder can help your workouts give the results you're hoping for.
Listen Jack, the schools need riot police to ensure the safety of their lawns.
It is interesting how the fakest of things can offer such insight into their creator. This nothing of a human is so desperate for validation about the wasted hours they have spent editing a poorly drawn frog for the uncaring half laugh of strangers, that they invented a scenario where someone could show any interest. So detached from the world they can't imagine anyone that would care enough to talk to them, so they project interest onto the therapist they pay to speak with.
"newsworthy"??
Who said news? The mailing list is my k-drama
Yeah FreeTube and NewPipe both work for me still. Might be a problem in the future, but I'm hoping I dodge by being in the weird nerd slice that isn't worth trying to force ads to.
It seems like you are building on criticisms of LLMs and applying them to something that very different. What poisoned data do you imagine this model having in the future?
That is a criticism of LLMs because new generations are being trained on writing that could be the output of LLMs, which can degrade the model. What suggests to you that this fusion reactor will be using synthetic fusion reactor data to learn when to stop itself?
I've found the selling point in not needing to open excel and click around to run the script. So often people need to do like the same three things and don't even know how to write Python, so giving them a script to drag your file onto is a step up from excel
view more: next ›
Well....