do you mean to say military dictatorship south korea, kuomingtang taiwan, nasserist egypt, and assadist syria are all fascist?

yeah its crass, blunt, and not polite but its just talking about who you're into

part of being a human being is having a physical body which will have features people like and another part of being a human being is having a libido and being interested in other people. the hard barrier you make going from "that person is pretty" (we can rephrase this to be "that person has overall features I consider attractive and possibly I find myself attracted to them") and "I'd fuck her" (that person has overall features I consider attractive and I find myself so attracted to them to the point I would have sex with them if given the opportunity) is in fact not a line going from not objectifiying to objectifiying but a natural continuation of the feeling and logic. the only real difference is the level of respect being given since "I'd fuck her" is a much less respectful phrase and the fact sex is being talked about which is why this ties into "puritan culture"

I don't understand whats creepy about it. is it socially inappropriate because you're talking about sex or inappropriate because you're talking about being attracted to someone?

yeah its pretty normal. not sure why americans are all such puritans that the idea of talking to your friends about who you're attracted to is abnormal

extremely dumb argument that the nazis weren't socialist because they took independent labour organizations and put then all together under one national organization. literally every communist government did the exact same thing along with many other countries like south korea and taiwan to egypt and syria. get better arguments please