Edie

joined 4 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Has it not? Has it not caused the death of 1 million people in Indonesia? Has it not caused 7 million excess deaths due to "shock-therapy" in Russia alone? Has it not caused the brutality, violence and oppression of the "dictatorships" that the CIA installed in Latin America? Has it not caused countless famines? Has it not caused the economic ruin of Africa and Latin America?

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

What happens if you turn this around?

The precise terminology of the US's political system is unimportant. What is important is that wherever the recipes of [Liberalism] have been tried, the result has been violence, brutality, oppression, famine, economic ruin.

This is all true of course. So what then? Do you also reject Liberalism?

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 weeks ago

There were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror — that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.

Taken from https://redsails.org/the-two-terrors/

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Maybe not. But we have to options: Socialism or Barbarism. Continuing with Capitalism is going to lead to a worse outcome, going with Socialism and working to halt climate change will result in a better outcome. Not a great one, not undoing everything in 5 years, but still a better outcome.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Probably not, but it will be able to prioritize things differently. Under socialism it doesn't matter if it is profitable to build high-speed rail, or profitable to run it thereafter, the point isn't to make money, the point is to transport people.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

someone so adamantly argue in clear bad-faith against someone who actually knows what they are talking about

To be fair, it is working really well.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

It's Flying Squid, I don't recommend engaging.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trekkie, star trek. Not tankie.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 month ago

Blowing up stuff inside their own borders... And how are they escalating?

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

I think there is like one party in Folketinget that is even slightly left, Enhedslisten.

[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

A cool book I like is This Soviet World. It shows the Soviet Union as experienced by the author in the 1930s.

view more: ‹ prev next ›