GivingEuropeASpook

joined 2 years ago
[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 5 points 2 years ago

Not really harmless tho, i’ve seen countless places turn into a trans circlejerk.

What exactly would that even be? "hnghh, we respect other people's choices and individuality, hngggh" How awful. All we want is to have the same respect and autonomy granted to straight and/or cis people to be granted to us.

As for the “caring” part, I don’t care whatever you are, just don’t mention it.

And that's harmful because unless you truly are consistent and also don't want men to mention their girlfriends or wives and for women to never mention their boyfriends or husbands around you, you're treating people differently based on their gender or sexuality, allowing someone to talk about their home life, what they may have done over the weekend with their partner, but only if it ain't gay or trans.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

That's...not how it works? IDK what else to say in such a steadfast denial of reality.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

Bourgeois governments gonna bourgeois

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ok, if you are a middle class parent with a little bit of savings, and one of your child wants to buy a house, wouldn’t you do everything you can with your money to help them too?

The point is that less and less people are in this position. Middle class parents with savings? What is this, 1985?

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 35 points 2 years ago (15 children)

God, if only people could just like pool their resources together to build homes or something...

We could even call it something like "social housing," and have it be a publically regulated service instead of treating housing as some sort of game of investment for the wealthy? No no, totally impossible...

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

yeah same, only like half of the videos load or play.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

It is? In one situation, a Senator is sent. The other, one is not. Therefore, factually different.

Things being immoral or wrong ≠ things being untrue

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Exactly, and Mastodon had been kinda gunning for Twitter for years before Elon went full Elon, so they were primed for the influx. Lemmy I think expected to have years to go before it's userbase would similarly skyrocket.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

You wanna talk about tight-knit clubs in the South? you should check out this story: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/26/black-mayor-alabama-town-locked-out

Literal "good ole boys club" ruling a 80% black rural town without any elections in living memory loses power through legal defaults, then decides "fuck it" and keeps ruling based on their personal and social influence.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

Wow, factually accurate rhetoric that still effectively conveys why something is wrong? Nothing like proving someone doesn't need to rely on oversimplistic hyperbole to make a point.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago (7 children)

It's still factually different from not sending Senators at all, which is all I'm saying.

[–] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 7 points 2 years ago

Damn, its been a while since someone said that in reference to something I said. I'm old enough now that I can't get student discounts anymore just based on looks.

view more: ‹ prev next ›