[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Bourgeois governments gonna bourgeois

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Ok, if you are a middle class parent with a little bit of savings, and one of your child wants to buy a house, wouldn’t you do everything you can with your money to help them too?

The point is that less and less people are in this position. Middle class parents with savings? What is this, 1985?

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago

God, if only people could just like pool their resources together to build homes or something...

We could even call it something like "social housing," and have it be a publically regulated service instead of treating housing as some sort of game of investment for the wealthy? No no, totally impossible...

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

yeah same, only like half of the videos load or play.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It is? In one situation, a Senator is sent. The other, one is not. Therefore, factually different.

Things being immoral or wrong ≠ things being untrue

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Exactly, and Mastodon had been kinda gunning for Twitter for years before Elon went full Elon, so they were primed for the influx. Lemmy I think expected to have years to go before it's userbase would similarly skyrocket.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

You wanna talk about tight-knit clubs in the South? you should check out this story: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/aug/26/black-mayor-alabama-town-locked-out

Literal "good ole boys club" ruling a 80% black rural town without any elections in living memory loses power through legal defaults, then decides "fuck it" and keeps ruling based on their personal and social influence.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Wow, factually accurate rhetoric that still effectively conveys why something is wrong? Nothing like proving someone doesn't need to rely on oversimplistic hyperbole to make a point.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It's still factually different from not sending Senators at all, which is all I'm saying.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Damn, its been a while since someone said that in reference to something I said. I'm old enough now that I can't get student discounts anymore just based on looks.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago

Also, it's never ACTUALLY about parental rights and protecting children. Plenty of parents want their kids to grow up believing that there is nothing inherently sexual about a naked body, or about women, but their perspective and rights never seem to be considered.

Think about how the reactionaries in control of many US states banned Drag Queen story hours and the like from libraries and schools, saying that it should be up to parents if they want their kids to go to them, only to then classify all drag shows as obscene and restricted to 18+.

[-] GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee 57 points 1 year ago

An internet devoid of unacceptable "deviations" from gender and sexuality too. Given the effort to erase trans and gay people from public spaces, this seems like a parallel effort to destroy their digital ones too.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

GivingEuropeASpook

joined 1 year ago