19
submitted 5 days ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
26
55
submitted 5 days ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
20
submitted 1 week ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
24
submitted 1 week ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/atheism@lemmy.world
8
submitted 1 week ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
73
submitted 2 weeks ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
339
submitted 2 weeks ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/news@lemmy.world
151
32
submitted 3 weeks ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
25
submitted 4 weeks ago by Midnight@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
1
[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 months ago

How about we get someone who can win in a swing state so we can avoid Trump? Because right now from the polling it looks like Biden can't.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 11 points 4 months ago

I'd vote for a literal corpse with a (D), but there's voters who are somehow undecided or ambivalent about fascism. The fact remains that the polling shows this hurts Biden in required swing states which is extremely concerning.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 23 points 4 months ago

Saying that Biden needs to be replaced is not the same as saying don't vote for whoever is the Democratic candidate. I've been screaming into the void telling people to vote on Lemmy and even I think he needs to be switched out. The post debate polling is that damning.

If the dems shove it down our throats I'm still voting for him, but there's still a narrow window to get a better candidate and we should take it.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 6 points 4 months ago

The article might have been well-informed and factual

Like many substacks purporting to give health information, its a massive link dump filled with unsupported suppositions in between. Reading all the links provided would give much more accurate information.

In the final paragraphs his insistence that everyone should be keto and not use any form of sunscreen gives away the fact he's a crank.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 27 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The point of an armorer on set is that they ensure that the guns aren't dangerous. The typical rules about "don't aim at something you don't want to destroy" doesn't apply in a movie because otherwise all the action sequences would look dumb with people firing wildly at the ground. How stupid would it look if John Wick shoots at the floor and blood spurts out of the guys face.

That said, anyone who hires a scab armorer gets what they pay for and deserve to be prosecuted.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 3 points 5 months ago

American Nations is probably the worst pop-history books I've had the displeasure of reading. Its chock full of backwards rationalizations, just-so narratives, and glaring misconstructions and omissions.

Any assessment of modern society based on this author is immediately suspect and we should honestly stop letting him write for any serious publication.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 12 points 5 months ago

Realistically any Libertarian dedicated enough to show up to a party conference is probably a member of the 1% of the US population that votes for them in general elections.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 months ago

Now when I'm lazy and don't support some standards in my open source projects, I'm just going to say its for security.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 months ago

So we're using Bush era torture to justify inaction against fascism? Idk man seems a little weird.

I get voting isn't enough and half the problem is people often limiting their involvement in society to a ballot once every four years, but I'd really like to prevent The Palestinian Chair from being used on anyone deemed an enemy of the state by a man who is talking about deporting 11 million people.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 11 points 6 months ago

404 Media is worker owned; you should pay them.

[-] Midnight@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 months ago

Vertical integation and scale are not inherently monopolistic. Some monopolies formed because they exploited these advantages, but there are competative industries today where several vertically integrated companies compete.

Monopolies in econ 101 are not called inefficient because they extract profit. They're inefficient because they don't respond to market forces. Since they control all supply, they can disregard demand.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

Midnight

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF