Not_mikey

joined 1 week ago
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 59 minutes ago

Too bad you can't do this to cyber trucks.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago

It's not, most studies put them about even, possibly more for crack but definitely not several times more addictive.

Meanwhile Sugar/sweetness is more addictive than cocaine but no ones calling to ban jolly ranchers.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Most drug harm experts think so:

Source

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

That statistic is about cocaine related deaths, not necessarily overdoses. Often with cocaine related deaths the user is taking multiple drugs at once, usually opiates, and often alcohol too, but it usually doesn't get blamed.

This is also more a problem with prohibition then cocaine itself since people don't know the dose of what there getting or adulterants. If it were legal like alcohol there would be far less deaths. There were far more deaths from alcohol under prohibition when your "whiskey" was full of methanol and industrial alcohol

Also overdose isn't the only danger from drugs. One that alcohol is miles ahead of every other drug is DUI, which kills about 13,000, meanwhile cocaine, by itself, is rarely implicated in DUI. Alcohol impairs your driving ability way more than cocaine. There's also chronic health concerns, which are harder to weigh. Alcohol is a carcinogen and chronic use fucks up your liver, meanwhile cocaine will fuck up your heart.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 hours ago

I remember I saw a video one time of Steven crowder ( right wing YouTube idiot) "infiltrate an antifa cell" and was freaking out because one of them had A KNIFE. meanwhile every other episode he's bragging that he's always packing his emotional support revolver.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Yes bidens diplomats made the deal, along with Qatari and Egyptian mediators, but they were unable to get Israel to sign it. It was only after trump was elected and started talking to bibi as the president elect that the Israelis signed the same deal that they rejected 6 months ago.

They hadn't achieved any significant accomplishment that would prompt them to say "we're good now" and finally sign. The only thing that changed was the incoming administration.

I don't know what trump said to bibi but whatever it was it changed his mind on a ceasefire. My guess is he just wanted a 6 week break so that he could roll out all the horrible shit he's been doing in his first month without having to deal with Gaza. They probably went along with it because trump is more likely to follow through on stopping weapons shipments because he's less committed to the zionist cause and political norms of unwavering "defensive" support for Israel.

Or maybe bibi was just tanking peace talks to drag down Biden and they were actually fine 6 months ago but wanted to help trump win first. Possibly with some collusion with the trump campaign but I doubt the dems will ever investigate that like they did russia because that would be anti-semetic.

In either case I don't think bibi would've signed if Harris won. Either because he doesn't respect her or he wants to drag down the democratic party.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

where are all the genocide Joe's at?

Here? It looks like the person who posted this is what you'd call a "genocide joe". There are tons of people in this thread like me arguing that what he did is still horrible. Do you want us to say trump is worse? Yeah rhetorically, but objectively Biden presided over a year and a half of unmitigated horrors and trump has presided over a ceasefire.

Money rules all. The war machine demands blood to convert into dollars.

If this were true, Biden wouldn't have pulled out of Afghanistan. He did though, despite huge backlash, which i commend him for, because he knew the war was an unjust waste of money. He didn't do the same for Gaza because he is a staunch zionist. This also ignores his lame duck period where he wasn't beholden to any corporate interests, and he still kept sending weapons to Israel, because he's doing it out of principal not pressure.

Also it's not like Afghanistan since there's still another war going on. If Biden cared about the genocide he could make a deal with these oligarchs to compensate any loss in sales in gaza with more spending on Ukraine.

Hopefully they'll switch there tone on the "incumbent advantage" after back to back one term presidencies.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (6 children)

We haven't invaded Gaza yet, and i don't think we will just like i don't think we'll invade Canada or Greenland. Trump says a lot of dumb shit that will never happen. The only thing that has happened since trump took over is a ceasefire.

we were not gonna stop them no matter who was in charge. I think Joe did as much as he could

He could've at least tried by blocking arms shipments. Biden could've done that at any time since there's already a law on the books that the u.s. must stop weapons shipments if there is credible evidence they will be used in war crimes. Biden and his state department refused to enforce this law and ignored multiple reports about war crimes to do so. One time they tried to do it on a specific squad in the Israeli military of ultra orthodox that was doing crimes in the west bank but gave in after bibi said it was anti-semetic.

Even if that wasn't an option Biden could've vetoed the many arms packages that were passed after it was clear Israel was attempting a genocide, he didn't. Even after he was effectively a lame duck after he dropped out and didn't have to worry about the Israel lobby. Even after he was actually a lame duck and the dems already lost.

This wasn't Biden being handcuffed by outside forces, he had multiple opportunities to stand against the genocide and refused to because he is an ardent zionist who is fine with the horrors in gaza.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Idk if you know this but there is a ceasefire right now. Most of the protests i went to were in response to some escalation or atrocity: new "aid" package being sent, expansion of the war into Rafah, expansion into Lebanon, ground forces going in etc. People tend to protest against escalation events but we are currently in a period of deescalation.

You should expect to see them again in response to trump's latest proposal, it's not going to happen overnight since this came out of nowhere, or when the first phase of the ceasefire expires and people protest to keep it going.

Also wtf is this aneurysm posting "it went from free Palestine to the Rivera of the middle east in 16 days" what does that even mean? And they say the pro-palestine people are bots.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 89 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (31 children)

Alright new atrocity from Israel just dropped, who should we blame:

  • ~~The fascists running Israel~~
  • ~~the fascists running the US~~
  • ~~the democratic party who teed up the atrocity~~
  • a couple hundred leftists on lemmy who didn't vote
[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It has, it's been a conspiracy on lemmy for the past 6 months. Any time anyone criticized Biden or Harris for aiding a genocide someone would pop up and say they're a secret republican or Russian bot.

view more: next ›