[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 2 days ago

The historical bit is just looking at things in a longer term context. It's a challenge for people, particularly at a younger age, to consider things in a view that goes beyond a single lifetime. In the past roughly 100 years we have gone from 'man will never fly' to being able to have this conversation on servers across the globe. Women getting a vote. Schools and entire societies being segregated by race. From as recent as my youth when being gay was a punchline to the LGBT community largely being not only accepted but actively supported.

There are losses here and again of course, but in a grand scheme view society has made notable progress. Maybe just a bit of frustration over the recent weeks with the 'nothing ever changes' mantra that seems so popular.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Cheney, for as much of a tool as he may be, at least hasn't shown himself to be fully engulfed in the maga cult and recognizes that allowing Trump into power is a legitimate threat to the entire system. It's less of an endorsement of Harris and more a rejection of Trump.

Edit: To touch on the 'eventually' aspect. I don't want it to sound like an excusing of the slow pace of change in our modern world, but put into context that the USA is, by global comparison, a young nation. Look at the time spans that nations in Asia or Europe have existed by comparison and the length of time it took to change their ways, often through drastic social upheaval. In comparison the gains in social equalities here have come at a rapid pace in the past century. For a place founded in violence and oppression where it was originally codified law that only white landowning males where of consequences we've made some notable improvements in the span of a few generations. As it stands today we're in a space where there are people legitimately clamoring for a second civil war due to the inability to find consensus on any number of issues. So many things that are common sense to the rest of the world are considered alien here, deemed 'un-american'. As we move along the road people come around to these 'radical' ideals, but it often takes a generation for them to become the norm.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 2 days ago

Must live on a busy street, most of those would be multi year totals around here.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 2 days ago

Hooray I'm average, at least for some fraction of a marathon...

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 2 points 2 days ago

Well at least I got a sticker out of the deal

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 11 points 2 days ago

Let's see this madness ended today. My daughter's will not be handmaidens, my young son will not grow up learning hate. As a child I was told our generation will fix the problems of the past and that assignment is long past it's due date.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 11 points 3 days ago

There is a separate thunderbird app from k-9 now, so apparently not just an update. Obnoxious though that the new app lists a bunch of collected data types while k-9 doesn't list any. Maybe just a legacy thing since K-9 has been around forever and they didn't list them originally, but still upsetting for the privacy minded.

TB:

K-9:

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 3 days ago

Gives new meaning to 'speak softly and carry a big stick'.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 1 points 3 days ago

See though that's too obvious. If he was terrified of cheez-it orange he would run in terror at the sight of Trump...

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 3 points 4 days ago

Yes, but I was comparing it to why is BlueSky welcome but Threads is not? Frankly I'd just as sooner keep all commercial entities out of the fedi, but there's no way to stop them from adding that functionality.

Not that there's anything stopping some instance of established fedi space from going rogue, sweeping up data and feeding ads either, but at least that's not their established model today.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 4 points 4 days ago

Why would people be eager to have a place like them joining the fedi? When Meta was first looking to add in threads there was a big push to tell every admin they need to proactively defederate from it. They may not be as notoriously bad as Meta when it comes to using and abusing the population, but it's still a commercial entity with the ability to do so and a will for profit.

[-] ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They claim $100 B in 'losses' to this kind of game. Unless they're actually running red on their books what they really mean is 'we think we should make at least $100 B more per year'.

I'm sure that the vast majority of that would go directly to the front of house employees they're pinning this on too, definitely not to the execs and share holders...

159
Ally in training... (lemmy.socdojo.com)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com to c/lgbtq_plus@beehaw.org

Hey all,

So I'm looking to take an active step here to understand better some things that my straight/white/cis/middle-aged male brain has had a tough time wrapping itself around, particularly in the gender identity front.

I'm working from the understanding of physical sex as the bio-bits and the expressed identity as being separate things, so that part is easy enough.

What's confusing to me though is like this. If we take gender as being an expression of your persona, a set of traits that define one as male, female, or some combination of both then what function does a title/pronoun serve? To assume that some things are masculine or feminine traits seems to put unneeded rigidity to things.

We've had men or women who enjoy things traditionally associated with the other gender for as long as there have been people I expect. If that's the case then what purpose does the need for a gender title serve?

I'll admit personally questioning some things like fairness in cis/trans integrated sports, but that's outside what I'm asking here. Some things like bathroom laws are just society needing to get over itself in thinking our personal parts are all that special.

Certainly not trying to stir up any fights, just trying to get some input from people that have a different life experience than myself. Is it really as simple as a preferred title?

Edit: Just wanted to take a second to thank all the people here who took the time to write some truly extensive thoughts and explanations, even getting into some full on citation-laden studies into neurology that'll give me plenty to digest. You all have shown a great deal of patience with me updating some thinking from the bio/social teachings of 20+ years back. 🙂

7
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com to c/rimworld@lemmy.world

Or, when you get a sudden windfall inheritance from on high.

205
A box of Oatmeal (lemmy.socdojo.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ShellMonkey@lemmy.socdojo.com to c/cat@lemmy.world
view more: next ›

ShellMonkey

joined 1 month ago