TheDannysaur

I mean the polls for Biden were bad and getting worse. Harris was only down a couple points... Biden was down double digits. I hate to say it, but with the 2 point polling error, Biden had 0 path to make it. I don't know a single state that he would have taken off of Trump.

Ah yes. Great. We're the election conspiracy theorists now. It's apparently democrats turn to make completely baseless accusations.

This stuff is exhausting. We want to look for every reason except for the one that matters: Democrats lost America. We need to break the party apart and start over.

Every other excuse just delays and distracts. Democrats fucked it. We can be all high and righteous as we want, but we lost 2 of 3 to Donald Trump.

Face the reality. Democrats need to reinvent themselves or they will lose to shit candidates like Trump.

.... So living further away from the equator is detrimental to your health? I haven't heard of this phenomenon.

Iowa itself is a lost cause. It's 75% Republican here. We're gerrymandered to high hell, so even if Baccam squeaks through, Iowa state legislature won't look very blue. If it's 60/40 Republican I'd be absolutely shocked.

But contributing one Senator nationally would be pretty neat.

If Harris gets Iowa the race is over. These races are not truly independent - they are correlated. If Harris picks up Iowa, there's a very good chance that means she's swept every swing state.

Right - I just mean literally any attempt to try and cater to a specific group is gonna be like this.

Both campaigns go after different groups. I just think literally anything that is contained in these are going to sound racist.

In a less charged example, both candidates try and appeal to women. Those could be viewed as sexist.

To be fair... When the article's opening line is "In outreach to Black Men", it doesn't really matter what you put after. It's going to sound bad.

It can be both things.

There are no definitive data points that should lead anyone to believe that either candidate has a significant advantage.

I'm not sure anyone who is well versed in election projections or polling would say anything other than it's a toss up. As a heavy consumer of said data and reporting, I haven't seen anything to the contrary.

You're not wrong about media incentives, but they're also not wrong that this is a very close race.

Technically... But there's also a lot of waste from the 500 pack that people throw out half of. It likely evens out.

Personally, I had to stop watching after a few episodes. The writing is just awful.

It's a lot of telling, not showing. And because of the poor writing, the actors suffer. There's not many good ways to deliver poorly written lines.

The changes they made might be logical, but the execution was poor. At least in the episodes I watched, it's like every character has to say exactly what they are feeling, and they do the whole "so what's the plan again" trope to remind the audience of what's going on way too often.

Sokka's character arc in season 1 was kinda botched... He was misogynistic in the original on purpose... And then got his ass absolutely handed to him by the Kyoshi warriors and it was a good moment. In this one they seemed afraid to hit the misogyny, so the moment was kinda lost, and the character development was flat.

There's just a lot is missteps, in my opinion, but the source is the writing. I don't think the acting is good, but it's because of the writing, not the actors.

.... What?

Is this some weird "victim mentality" thing?

People love to use it because it got popular and grew to mean more than the original definition to the point where it just got generic to encompass a wide range of things. It's the same as cringe.

I thought the same thing. People are obsessed with the word gaslighting.

This seems more like textbook hypocrisy. Person doing thing talks about the harms of others doing that thing.