alianne

joined 1 year ago
[–] alianne@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes, people pay $20 to buy a WoW token from the cash shop which then gets sold on the in game auction house. That person gets in game gold (the amount fluctuates), and the person who bought the token from the auction house gets their choice of either $15 of shop balance or 30 days of game time.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Yep! People will buy WoW tokens from the auction house with gold, and they can either redeem the tokens for $15 of shop balance or 30 days of game time. I like making gold in game, so anything I've bought from Blizzard over the last few years (including WoW expansions and other games) has been with gold.

The price of tokens went up by about 100,000 gold after this mount got announced and they were selling out fairly regularly for the rest of the day. It seems to have stabilized now, though.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago (4 children)

It's definitely still chugging along, although I will point out that the sub numbers now include not only modern WoW players but also Classic players. If the 7 million number is accurate, that's 7 million across all WoW versions, not just modern WoW.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Same. A friend and I were excited to play together like we did in D3, but we barely managed to finish the campaign. It's on the shelf for now unless/until we hear the team turned things around.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

I see your point - I'm also happy with the current version. That said, I did purchase the app with the expectation of continued development. I'm not demanding major weekly updates in perpetuity or anything, but I don't feel it's unreasonable to want reassurance that the app you paid for hasn't been abandoned a few months after release.

(To be clear, I mentioned in another comment that I know this is normal for Sync and we will likely get more updates down the road. I can just also understand OP's concern.)

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 30 points 11 months ago

I have no concrete answers, but this was fairly common with the Sync for Reddit app as well. We'd go several months without updates before they'd resume for a while and then drop off again.

I'm relatively confident the same will happen here, so updates will probably return soon^TM .

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

True, if it turned into a situation where you had to sub with money for a month every time you wanted to redeem a token or something, that would definitely lessen the value for me. I'd still say it was worth it because I could use the tokens for expansions and other games, but not everyone may have the same opinion.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

The WoW token wasn't introduced until WoD, so if you played that long ago it wouldn't have been an option. If you're ever looking to jump in again though, it's definitely a useful system if you like to make gold in game.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Free trials can't farm gold anyway because they're capped to 1k gold, so this really does only impact bot accounts for the most part. There's likely a small number of people who use tokens because they otherwise couldn't afford to play, but I expect that's not terribly common.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago (7 children)

As someone who uses gold to buy WoW tokens for both game time and shop credit to make other Blizzard purchases, I have a hard time getting upset over this. I've been playing the game without spending money for years, and tokens are also how I buy both WoW expansions and other Blizzard games. Asking me to pay money for a month of sub time every few years seems reasonable, especially if this change makes it even the slightest bit annoying/harder for bot accounts.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

That might be better, but I'd still worry about people rep farming (for lack of a better term). Any time you give people a score, title, or other personal metric, you run the risk of people posting to influence that metric rather than to post for the sake of contributing content.

It's possible the good such a system could do would outweigh the bad, but it will definitely always have elements of both.

[–] alianne@lemmy.world 63 points 1 year ago (2 children)

While karma might help spam/bots in some ways, I feel like it would also lead to karma farming, which I'm personally happy to not have here. Maybe they could instead allow communities to set requirements for minimum time subscribed or minimum interaction (voting, commenting, etc.) before people could post? I'd prefer that be set per-community, though, and not a site-wide mandate.

 

They may not be the first animal you'd expect to find in this community, but the rubber ducky isopods in SerpaDesign's new video definitely made me say "awww."

 

Is there a setting that will allow me to view upvotes and downvotes as separate numbers rather than one combined score? This is the one setting in Jerboa that I can't seem to find in Sync. Jerboa:

Sync:

view more: next ›