casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer

joined 1 year ago
[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oh right, I forgot that funding and companies manifest solely from engineers' desires to build things. Silly me.

I've never met any Minecraft player that played Story Mode, but a few had primary school siblings that did.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

I'm lost. The one originally posted in this thread looks like the pool photo but ~~very slightly desaturated~~ with slight adjustment of white balance, whereas the fake is clearly oversaturated.

I don't really care to pull this up on my desktop to confirm, but I don't really need an answer because the rest of the photo, unaltered, is enough to marvel at. His hands show he never worked a day in his life. His poor handwriting in such big text, either meant to be seen by reporters or just for his own amusement, is telling. Who still supports this child?

You can do it through the instance API.

Admins at lemmy.ml used vote tracking against me to retaliate by deciding what communities to ban me from after I spoke out against disinformation. They felt that censorship wasn't enough, they felt the need to be malicious in order to make a point. Sucks to be them though, they forgot the part about keeping your cards close to the chest.

glad they posted it twice so we can all play both sides, upvote one in case it's sarcasm, downvote the other in case of troll.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yes-- campaigns that involve influencing people's opinions with covert guerrilla campaigns across social media with no accountability. Among the other shady tactics in their playbooks.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Hey man that's your choice, but please just keep in mind that when you vote for the third party, the other two parties gain more ground than they lose-- both lose your vote, but you're in no way impeding other party from winning. This is why people are saying it's a game of voting against least favored candidates, because your impedance is much more significant than your support.

It won't matter to Republicans what platform the constituents are showing them should be adopted once they institute Project 2025 into law.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Except, as far as I can tell, the system is designed such that citizens can't make them change it-- what are you going to do, vote for nobody and force the government to fix it's shit before electing a new president? I mean, you could revolt but I think we all know how quickly the government would act to squash any meaningful attempt to. And if Project 2025 is allowed to play out, then military can be dispatched to handle simple protests instead of the police, so good luck pressuring the government to do anything at that point.

They already put snipers on rooftops at every University for the Palestine protests. Supposedly this was for public safety as there was intel that things would turn violent, but who really knows the truthfulness of such intel or where the order came down from? When the military becomes your police, this act would pale in comparison.

Remember this when you go to the polls, or when you are considering not to.

[–] casual_turtle_stew_enjoyer@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

With no offense intended, I feel this could be worded a little better. It could also just be my tired brain, though.

Right, I didn't mean to imply that the practice was uncommon, just that using it as a defense of ego so readily was eyebrow-raising. I'm no academic, but I feel like I'd lose respect for my advisor had they used the paper I worked hard on as a way to boost numbers used as personal defense in some petty squabble in a public forum.

view more: next ›