combat_doomerism

joined 1 month ago
[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

glad to see carc0sa will be remaining in an admin role. saying it again but i do apologize for anything dumb I said in the other thread last night, I generally trust the admins and wasnt trying to say something nefarious has been going on

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

yeah but i need some context, their first ban was for?:

reason: Promotion of terrorism

like ???

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 15 points 5 days ago (7 children)

who is this based_ball person

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 20 points 5 days ago (1 children)

there's like 2 of them. and you can pry them from my cold dead hands, train-shining team winning news gives me life

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 24 points 5 days ago (3 children)

we should just ban the word on hexbear, we're all nerds here, c/sports gets less than 20 posts in a month

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

my only idea is to literally just start pinning effort posts people make. i know that probably would come with the problem of picking which ones to pin and users getting mad if they didn't pin your post but it would be the only way to force engagement to them

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 23 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

i apologize for how dumb what I said came across, im not trying to make anything seem nefarious, the whole swathe of admins being removed and what not was just supposed to be an example of the admins not really explaining what goes on behind the scenes at all, my point was I had 0 clue if it was for new admins or for opsec like you said.

as far as the timeline, quite frankly I was kind of trying to come up with something to defend the admins actually, there are people accusing yall of wanting to impose culture from the top down (especially in the context of doing it to please lib admins in other instances because you were upset over the election) and I was trying to explain that i thought it might have come from yall thinking there was a chunk of people who wanted it because of the misogyny thread. i'll delete it if you want

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 12 points 5 days ago

that's cheating, someone making spam alt accounts is unfair same thing happens when the hexbearxxx@thelemmy.club spammer that wanders into the news mega sometimes

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 25 points 5 days ago (1 children)

technically, although they too have plenty of shitposting. biggest issue is that they arent leftist unity, and also not as loudly queer friendly. if you like those aspects of hexbear but want it to be more serious you cant really just go to grad

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 19 points 5 days ago

i mean you can check it out yourself someone posted the public chat it was in. anything in dms i doubt they release themselves, they have seemed to take offense to dm leaking in the past so i doubt they do it themselves

[–] combat_doomerism@hexbear.net 13 points 5 days ago

ah i think this would be a little different then, this would only be for temp bans was my understanding so maybe it would be a little less controversial?

view more: next ›