Some maybe help.
elfpie
joined 10 months ago
As I have learned today: "tabstospaces": true
I have to admit that this was the discussion that made me realize we can easily believe a problem exists just because it theoretically might exist. The discussion started without any data backing the claims. People said there was an advantage and that it was unfair, but they were just words that connected to internal belief systems that were either faulty or bigoted.
It's similar to the discussion of sportswear. The solution is offering athletes choice and autonomy, but it's easy to end up in discussions criticizing the clothes without consulting the people that are affected and the reality of their situation.
You can always subsidize.
I have been using them for the same reason after trying a couple of other ones. I didn't like their client for Linux, but I'm happy otherwise.
You eat the base of the pizza there? That's crazy. It's like eating a paper plate. You are supposed to eat only the topping. Next you're gonna say you eat the bread that wraps your sandwiches.
Próximo alvo vai ser o Paypal? Bancos vão ter que pagar também?
It's not always that simple. For beach volley, I saw athletes commenting that shorts are worse because of the sand getting in the way. Men would chose something better in a different culture. There's sexism I believe, but it's not always what we would expect.
I have an account in beehaw too, and it's usually the one that interacts with the world. It's considerably different from a different instance.
Isn't gender always self reported in these kind of questionnaires?
Are you saying we can't know if someone is male or female just by looking at them and that there are other options according to the discussion below?
view more: next ›
I half remember something like that happening in Brazil. The right proposes something the left approves, there's no fight, they realize their mistake and start opposing their own idea.