Or they are quite irritated at smartass comments like that and yours. You're a clever-mcgee pulling off the oldest play of letters and words, don't you?

Its sarcasm. All the theatre about voting third party doesn't make sense because people could shut up and do that if they feel they want to make a change. The loud noise is most likely coming from people trying to derail one candidate or the other.

Much better than pretending that you're doing something while the billionaires laugh on their way to congress.

I appreciate you not escalating in response to my snarky comment with more snark or sarcasm.

On the subject: I agree that the system needs to motivate certain behaviors and disincentives others. But from the current point onwards in our cursed reality... I see no way this transition to such a system does not involve a violent revolution/uprising. I don't see how we can even maintain such a system in the future without threat of violence towards those that put profits before everything else. I believe this because it took violence to take back 40 hour work weeks and paid vacations. Those seem trivial compared to a system overhaul from the current starting point.

You sweet summer child. You think billionaires don't control things?

So your argument is that everybody is evil and thus we should give up voting and thus ensuring that there is no hope for democracy vs. Accepting even 1% chance that this election won't change our future for the better?

White people and men don't understand the glass walls others have had to endure. You should sympathize before thinking you're the victim.

No you just start by marking all nodes as unvisited and perform a search from a random starting node. you store the current bfs set of vertices in a sorted datastructure. Repeat until there are no more unvisited nodes.

No it's true. A relative of mine is like this as well, unfortunately.

When meta abuses entire countries and skirts regulations... i think a fucking $25 meal card is just petty bullshit.