This is sometimes true. However, e.g., about 4% of the farmland in California is used for alfafa, which is just for livestock. Alfafa is also a very water intensive crop.

Additionally, there are other uses that livestock corn feed could be put to if there weren't so many damn cows, so it's not like we'd be throwing away megatons of silage if it weren't for cattle.

World population increase + westernization of diets in China outweigh the tiny number of vegans in the western world. Your math doesn't check out.

It takes less land and water to feed someone wheat, soy or corn than to feed them beef, chicken or pork.

Not the guy you were replying to, but Everspace 1 and 2 are both great, arcade-y space shooters. I like 1 better than 2, but I've played both a bunch

Honestly, there should be weight classes for awards like this. Best game under $20 full price or over $50 for each category. Sure, BG3 is a masterpiece, but it also had $100 million investor cash up front. Comparing the score from BG3 to whatever Danny B is working on right now isn't a fair comparison, and my dude deserves more awards

This is exactly my thought. In Skyrim, every tree stump looked like it had the benefit of a beauty pass by an artist. In Starfield, it's very clear that most of the ground was never looked at before I got there, and there's no reason for me to look at it now

Skyrim isn't full of unskippable cut scenes.

Have you played Everspace and Everspace 2? They're more arcade-y but they scratch the same itch for me. The core gameplay is just fast paced space dogfights

I don’t really see the difference.

That is how the line of thinking goes. However, most arguments are wrong, so statistically speaking, that argument about simulation theory is probably wrong

It may surprise you to learn that 'people' and 'not people's are treated differently under the law