htrayl

joined 1 year ago
[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter. You are ignoring the rot at the core. Even if people turned out and kamala won - it Trump should have broken the Republican party. It should not have been a competition.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 42 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

There is going to be an assload of fingerpointing.

Here is my take: even if Kamala won, there is a deep rot that we would be in denial about. Trump should have broken the Republican party but did not and instead galvanized support through misinformation, lies, and hatred. That would not have been cured if Kamala won. At least now we have to be honest with the state of the US.

Still, we can hope he dies of a heart attack.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Was learning about the requirements it be a baker in Germany - something like 3 years of school to work at a bakery, 6 years to own one. Crazy.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Sounds like an easy bread pudding :)

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 101 points 1 month ago (9 children)

The common name comes from the Romans, who ate them as a delicacy.

First paragraph.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I think the better solution is to simply set up a filter for the word "Unsubscribe".

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

There is a very distinct double standard when it comes to the candidates and what the media and citizens focus on. Kamala has to be flawless and Trump gets a "Trump will be Trump" attitude.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The bachelor fridges are fine in communities not designed entirely for cars.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago (9 children)

There is the doomerism timeline. "Well, it's too late now, no reason to change anything now!".

Doomerism is just an evolution of binary thinking.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not just transphobic: Intersex-phobic and libelous

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

I would say your simply wrong.

It is not more moral to keep billions of animals alive, and in miserable conditions, solely for the purpose of consuming them, despite any romanticized idea of keeping a completely artificially selected species around.

And also, that there isn't a world where we completely give up meat eating anyways, and even less of a world where we let them go extinct.

[–] htrayl@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Not sure how you are defining nepotism here.

view more: next ›