ipitco

Oh yea of course they’re not, and I would say bigotry was not my aim with my comment. The company can do whatever the fuck they want and it’s probably better this way.

I do get that some people might want extreme free speech where nothing gets censored. It allows for other non conventional ideas to spread. For better, and for worse. Yea nowadays it’s often for worse but hey, there’s still a chance. All of this is really subjective.

I just don’t believe that a mod that changes Voice 1 and Voice 2 to Women voice and Men voice is bigotry. Removing pride flags in a game is… well it says a lot of the person, but it doesn’t harm anyone directly and it’s something you have to actively add to your game if you want it. There could be criticism of pride which can be valid as well but that’s beyond my point.

Having this kind of content hidden and with trigger warnings is still more or less doable depending on the content, and can allow for more expression than classical rules, and not only bad expression.

Shitty mods like Crack Life for half-life are super offensive but funny as hell if you take it with a grain of salt. Knowing that could be banned sucks.

I financially frauded once. I’ve never been penalized for it. That must mean the government is fine with it.

I insulted someone in a game and never got penalized for it, so it must mean the moderators in that game are okay with it.

It’s the same kind of logic, no?

That’s the kind of things that happens. Else I guess I hallucinated a couple times in a row, or I mod removed my posts and banned my account by myself. Must be what happened.

Either everything is moderated and censored, or nothing. No in between can exist.

Seriously, come on, that’s not how it works and you know it as much as me.

And fortunately there are still mods that let you speak, people that don’t report you… but what I describe will end up happening if you have these kind of behaviors or point of view.

Studies did not find that there’s a lack of advantage as well, therefore why use it as a point? What I meant is that there’s place for a debate on this question.

There has been no advantage shown in the short or long sprint events nor any other categories.

I’ll have to disagree with you on this. Based on my research I did not find conclusive evidence on this. A sample size inferior to thousands is not sufficient to test anyways.

Athletes with more money poured into them for training and equipment have a significant advantage over other athletes.

That’s a well known problem. Sadly, not much we can do to fix it without creating other problems. We’re all unequal on this :(

If you want an example, I said trans athletes being in man or women categories is a debate and shouldn’t be allowed by default because of inequalities between the individuals, and true equality can never be reached.

I believe the use of "biological men" trigged them when I said that transgender women were that… when I was talking about scientific stuff to make my point.

Super transphobic, watch out! ☢️ -_-

I thought it was obvious that it was an exaggeration. If you go out of the normal way, according to the mods, well you’re fucked

I was mainly talking about moderation. Weirdos are annoying but can be ignored

Believe whatever you want. I’m saying that based on my experience.

I guess this is supposed to be ironic?

Oh and also the double standards

You can hope for Musk and Trump or any rich fuck to die, but do this with someone else and you’re banned

Depends on the things you say, where…

If you’re generally leftist, you should mostly be fine.

Otherwise you get banned for trolling (because ofc they’re right so you’re trolling) or transphobia, because if you don’t agree with everything a trans person says, you’re transphobic. Also, the world belongs to them.

Talk about lesser known subjects by the public or make a mistake yourself? Thats it, you’re banned for misinformation and trolling. Or being a nazi or racist or whatever. The words don’t have a meaning anymore

Also the random ban reasons like "Rule 3" which refers to the most open and subjective rules like "Be civil" or "Dont be a dick" or similar

Pretty much all platforms do this. It’s not a bad thing to want a big and established uncensored platform

I wouldn’t call that challenging but rather censorship and exclusion/discrimination