kemal007

joined 1 year ago
[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lindsay graham comes to mind.

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

When I remember back to the early 80s, me a single digit aged human with my first Commodore 64 and a cassette tape drive, to being a high school aged kid and helping my buddies install their extended memory set chip by chip to get them to 1mb of ram, to way in the future where I type this comment on a mobile phone touch screen capable of unfathomable high resolution graphics and speed is still a surreal feeling.

I grew up and grew old with computers and it’s wild to imagine a life without and a world without them nearly 50 years later.

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So they took 11m in excess share options and give back 3.xm now is that due to the difference in price or just an “ok make this enough” settlement?

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I think baked beans are more of a BBQ item and July 4th is also a big BBQ day. Baked beans and bbq go way back :)

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

perhaps they also can see it and feel it directly but have decided its largely unavoidable, something they are largely unable to change, and just give up? sometimes i think it's as much about lack of control and weariness as much as it is about apathy.

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

are they wrong though? let's say in this hypothetical situation, i have never ever had a social media account. Checkmate privacy invaders!

except wait, i have family, like my mother, who have my name and phone number saved in their phone, probably my birthday and address too if they fill out the contact card completely, which they've given permission to facebook to access to "find other friends", and boom, now i have an entry in a data tracking database without ever opting in myself (i know this is a core privacy argument, not arguing that).

so how is the average person wrong in the "they already have it anyway" camp?

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm new too but that was also my thought - that it could lead to a lot of bad acting, but what do i know

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

If you want to see only high effort content only join appropriate communities, it’s as easy as that. To justify blthr block because it will taint the space is just a bad arguments in my eyes.

couldn't agree more. there's certainly plenty of 'content' on the fediverse that i have absolutely zero interest in and would rather not see - but i can control that pretty easily even as a new user so I don't see the value in gatekeeping. maybe I dont care about linux but maybe both the linux user and I both like catswithjobs - that's the beauty of diversity, of finding common bonds amidst the differences and celebrating together.

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i left reddit not because i have to use their shitty app - i left because it was completely crystal clear that the management attitude toward users is extremely toxic and hateful. Basically repeatedly gave the community the finger, and continues to do so. It's their playground, but i dont have to go where i feel unwanted.

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

never found this community on reddit, but im glad you're here, seems like a fun time. /subscribe

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn’t the source of a lot of it the random undocumented changes Reddit kept making to their api? That’s my recollection of the various video and gifv bugs at least. Those were the only ones that were super annoying to me anyway.

My only disappointment from Christian is waiting for years for the mythical iPad update. :(

[–] kemal007@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Isn’t this how Reddit gold originally was presented? No ads, perks like the lounge, and if I recall right how much server time you’d contributed, along with the impact of daily contributions and etc

view more: next ›