Steam dropping support for Windows 7, 8 and 8.1 means users who purchased games for their PC during that era are SOL if their machine is not capable of running the latest Windows.
Synopsis
In the video, Louis reads a discussion thread between a Steam customer and their support team regarding older Windows versions being dropped. The customer is admittedly a bit salty in their writing. Steam doesn't directly answer the customer's questions, and instead points the customer to Steam's existing statements made about dropping support for older Windows versions.
Louis makes the argument that even though he agrees with Steam's stance on things such as piracy and their general consumer-oriented attitude, if we are dependent on Steam to launch games, especially on older systems where we can't unplug the ethernet and be able to still launch the game, do we really own the game to begin with?
Commenter views
Some commenters mentioned that this is a Chrome issue, as Steam's interface itself is a web browser and if Chromium drops support for older systems, Steam is stuck.
Other commenters mentioned it's a Microsoft issue, as more issues surface in unsupported Windows versions, it would be in Steam's best interests to drop support for these.
Another one mentioned that the DMCA provides an exemption for cracking games that you already own, if it is no longer being supported.
Links
What's your take on this?
Youtube/Invidious (A piped link should be posted by a bot below)
Flash drive hidden under the carpet and connected via a USB extension, holding the decryption keys - threat model is a robber making off with the hard drives and gear, where the data just needs to be useless or inaccessible to others.
There's a script in the initramfs which looks for the flash drive, and passes the decryption key on it to cryptsetup, which then kicks off the rest of the boot mounting the filesystems underneath the luks
I could technically remove the flash drive after boot as the system is on a UPS, but I like the ability to reboot remotely without too much hassle.
What I'd like to do in future would be to implement something more robust with a hardware device requiring 2FA. I'm not familiar with low level hardware security at all though, so the current setup will do fine for the time being!