[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

I did well in pragmatics. My bane was syntax - that professor did a really poor job even to explain the basics, for example I still don't know why the hell you're supposed to spam XP, X' and X in generative trees even if they won't branch out anyway.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 4 points 4 hours ago

What you said immediately reminded me Grice's "Logic and Conversation". The author outline what he calls "conversational maxims", that resemble a lot your five bullet points - except that they don't just apply to technical writing, they're more like principles that we "automatically" use in human conversation. They are:

  1. Maxim of quantity - "be as informative as possible and needed, and no more."
  2. Maxim of quality - "be truthful; don't give false or unconfirmed info."
  3. Maxim of relation - "be relevant; say things that are pertinent to the discussion."
  4. Maxim of manner - "be clear, brief, and orderly; avoid obscurity and ambiguity."

Those four maxims are constantly being violated by the speakers, as they're in conflict with each other. For example, clarity (maxim of manner) often requires simplifying things, to the point that they aren't as accurate (maxim of quality) as before.

This is relevant here because, if you can't avoid violating those maxims, you need to reach a compromise. And good writing is about finding a good compromise for the target readers.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 5 hours ago

I'm fine with replies correctly filling what I've deleted with actual and meaningful info.

Instead, most of the time, I regret it due to some reply misrepresenting what I said - because the replier is now assuming shit, or interpreting literally a figure of speech that I've used for brevity, etc.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 9 hours ago

I’m trying to be realistic here, OC would be nice, but we probably don’t have the numbers, and more importantly, we are competing against Reddit 2024.

I get it - and it's a fair point. Identifying the problem is always easier than to solve it.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 6 points 9 hours ago

I don't know, even if I'm extremely prone to write huge walls of text, and need to actually take my time to abridge them.

(And every bloody time that I do abridge it, some reply makes me regret it.)

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I don’t think that was the right call, Discord and Slack are absolutely the wrong tools to maintain a forum

They definitively aren't - and even if Discord was the right tool format-wise, going to another locked-in platform is the same as asking "please abuse me again".

EDIT: fuck, it just clicked me why you said so. Discord might be a good place to advertise Lemmy, indeed - good catch.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago

The issue is that Reddit became a place to host OC because it had such a large userbase.

It's a feedback loop: users attract OC, OC attracts users. We [Lemmy/Mbin/PieFed users] can feed this loop from one, another, or both sides at once, and I believe that currently we should be focusing on the OC side more.

Originally, it was just a link agregators based on votes, there were not even comments or subs.

That is true. However there's a catch: Reddit's main competitor Digg was also just a link aggregator, while our main competitor (2024 Reddit) is already way more than just that. We don't have the luxury to follow the same steps as Reddit followed and hope that we'll succeed as Reddit did.

There is some OC created here in !inktober@sh.itjust.works for instance

Some of that content is really good, but it's missing contact info that can be backtracked to Lemmy. It's content made to consume inside Lemmy and nowhere else.

but realistically, if someone made a nice infographic today, would they really only post it here on Lemmy, and not share it on Reddit as well, the picture itself, without any reference to Lemmy, to avoid their publication to get removed?

Yes if they are specifically creating said content to nurture Lemmy. And then as people share someone else's content in Reddit, they can't simply remove that authorship info, even if it's a link to a Lemmy profile - that's the same as lying that you created what you didn't create, you know?

Edit: Instagram and Twitter would also be places to reach a much wider audience compared to here

Instagram could be worth a try.

I think that Twitter would have the same problems as you mentioned for Mastodon (people preferring the microblogging format), plus the same that we get from Reddit (your typical 2024 Twitter user isn't healthy to have around).

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 12 hours ago

Damn, that's a bummer.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 0 points 12 hours ago

Perhaps the question is instead "how?".

Like, instead of looking where we should advertise Lemmy (is it Reddit? Mastodon? Old style forums? etc.), what if we advertised it through original content? If it's good enough it'll be shared by people who aren't even Lemmy users, and reach multiple places at once. If we include in that OC links to our profiles (as authorship) it's automatically bringing people here, from a more diverse userbase, as they seek more of that stuff.

I feel like this strategy is actually viable nowadays, unlike (say) before the 3rd party app fiasco, since for at least some content we already reached a critical mass.

Infographics in special are a really good way to do so, I think. And the format is flexible enough that you can put anything in an infographic, from cooking stuff to some fandom (I'm looking at the Star Trek fans in the Fediverse) to how to degoogle yourself or even political stuff.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 3 points 16 hours ago

‘Witch hunts’ sounds like somebody got called out for their bad behavior.

I can't speak for the OP, but on general grounds:

Witch hunts aren't the result of someone being called out for their bad behaviour. It's when someone assumes that you behave badly.

Or, for a slightly less sloppy definition: "to witch hunt is to publicly denounce someone or something as coming from a socially undesirable group of people, without rational grounds to do so. Note that the last part is key here.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

But where would users for this specific format come from if not largely reddit?

As old style forums went out of fashion, I think that a lot of people simply disengaged, instead of migrating. I wonder if we could make this chunk of the Fediverse a bit more friendly towards those.

Mastodon would be also a good source of new users, I think. The format is completely different, but for some people preferring one or another is about their mood.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago

I also think that the Lemmy userbase should be recruited from more different places than just Reddit. The main difference is "why" - I care about norms, not normies; Reddit culture established all those shitty social norms that bring out the worst of everyone: irrationality/stubbornness, soapboxing, entitlement, so goes on.

Witch hunting is only an issue here because of that Reddit culture - because it's what make someone

  • assume that someone else is a witch, without rational grounds to do so;
  • keep stubbornly insisting that someone else is a witch even after being shown contrariwise;
  • screech at anyone who defends the not-witch "why are you defending a witch? You must be also a witch REEEEE".

I think that a good solution for this problem would be instance admins and moderators to explicitly disallow witch hunting, and admins defederate from instances enabling such behaviour. (Or potentially bring it to legal grounds since witch hunting fits nicely the legal def of libel in plenty countries.) But that's just me throwing ideas, take it for a grain of salt.

Federation with Threads is by no means a big concern nowadays, since most instances did the right thing and defederated it.

-1
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/canvas@toast.ooo

[Idea] If you don't want to see huge flags taking space over actual drawings in the Canvas, pick the biggest flag that you can find to deface.

As long as a lot of people are doing that, the ones templating larger flags will be forced to reduce their layouts and give more room for actual drawings.


[Reasoning] When it comes to country flags, I think that the immense majority of the users can be split into four groups:

  1. The ones who don't want to see country flags at all.
  2. The ones who are OK with smaller flags, but don't want to see larger ones.
  3. The ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of space.
  4. The ones who want to see the whole canvas burning, like the void.

I'm myself firmly rooted into #1, but this idea is a compromise between #1, #2 and #4.

Typically #3 uses numbers (and/or bots) to seize a huge chunk of the canvas to their flags. Well, let's use numbers against it then. As long as #1, #2 and #4 are trying to wreck the same flag, we win.


[inb4]

But what about identity flags?

Not a problem. They're typically bands instead of thick squares, and people drawing them are fairly accommodating.

But what about [insert another thing]

Even if [thing] is a problem, it's probably minor in comparison with huge country flags.

What should be the template?

None. We don't need one, as long as everyone is working against the same large flag.

Just draw something of your choice over the flag, preferably over its iconic features.

But I'm not creative enough for that!

No matter how shitty your drawing is, it's probably still way more original than a country flag. So don't feel discouraged.

That said, you can always help someone else with their drawing. Or plop in some text. Or just void.

Why are you posting this now, you bloody Slowpoke?

I wish that I thought about this before Canvas 2024. But better later than never. (And better early by a year for Canvas 2025.)


EDIT: addressing on general grounds some whining from group #3 (the ones who want to see a specific large flag taking a huge chunk of the canvas space).

You do realise that this sort of "war against the largest flag" should benefit even you, as long as the biggest flag is not the one you're working with, right? Even for you, this makes the canvas a more even level field. Let us not forget that you love to cover other flags with your own.

81
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

I'm sharing this here mostly due to the alphabet. The relevant region (Tartessos) would be roughly what's today the western parts of Andalucia, plus the Algarve.

Here are the news in Spanish, for anyone interested.

The number of letters is specially relevant for me - 32 letters. The writing system is a redundant alphabet, where you use different graphemes for the stops, depending on the next vowel; and it was likely made for a language with five vowels, so you had five letters for /p/, five for /t/, five for /k/. Counting the "bare" vowels this yields 20 letters; /m n s r l/ fit well with that phonology, but what about the other seven?

312
submitted 5 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/cat@lemmy.world
17
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/cooking@lemmy.world

This recipe is great to repurpose lunch leftovers for dinner. It's also relatively mess-free. Loosely based on egg-fried rice.

Amounts listed for two servings, but they're eyeballed so use your judgment.

Ingredients:

  • Cooked leftover rice. 200~300g (cooked) is probably good enough. It's fine to use pilaf, just make sure that the rice is cold, a bit dry, and that the grains are easy to separate.
  • Two eggs. Cracked into a small bowl and whisked with salt, pepper, and MSG. Or the seasoning of your choice.
  • Veg oil. For browning.
  • Water. Or broth if you want, it's just a bit.
  • [OPTIONAL] Meats. Leftover beef, pork, or chicken work well. Supplement it with ham, firmer sausages, and/or bacon; 1/2 cup should be enough for two. Dice them small.
  • [OPTIONAL] Vegs. I'd add at least half raw onion; but feel free to use leftover cooked cabbages, peas, bell peppers, etc. Or even raw ones. Also diced small.
  • [OPTIONAL] Chives. Mostly as a finishing touch. Sliced thinly.

Preparation:

  1. Add a spoonful of veg oil to a wok or similar. Let it heat a bit.
  2. If using raw meats: add them to the wok, and let them brown on high fire, stirring constantly. Else, skip this step.
  3. If using raw vegs: add them to the wok, and let them it cook on mid-low fire. Else, skip this step.
  4. Add the already cooked ingredients (rice, meats, vegs). Medium fire, stirring gentle but constantly; you want to heat them up, not to cook them further. Adjust seasoning if desired.
  5. Spread the whisked egg over your heated rice mix, while stirring and folding the rice frenetically. You want the egg to coat the rice grains, but they should be still separated when done. If some whisked egg is sticking to the wok and/or the rice is too dry, drip some water/broth and scrap the bottom of the wok; just don't overdo it (you don't want soggy rice). Anyway, when the egg is cooked this step is done, it'll give the rice grains a nice yellow colour and lots of flavour.
  6. If using chives, add them after your turned off the fire (they get sad if cooked). Enjoy your meal.

I was going to share a picture of the final result, but I may or may not have eaten it before thinking about sharing the recipe. Sorry. :#

162
submitted 6 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/cat@lemmy.world

I got a weird problem involving both of my cats (Siegfrieda, to the left; Kika, to the right).

Kika is rather particular about having her own litterbox(es), and refuses to use a litterbox shared by another cat. Frieda on the other hand is adept to the "if I fits, I sits, I shits" philosophy, and is totally OK sharing litterboxes.

That creates a problem: no matter if properly and regularly cleaned, the only one using litterboxes here is Frieda. We had, like, five of them at once; and Kika would still rather do her business on the patio.

How do I either teach Kika "it's fine to share a litterbox", or teach Siegfrieda "that's Kika's litterbox, leave it alone"?

50
submitted 6 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz
25
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/houseplants@mander.xyz

Context: my mum got some keikis of this orchid from a neighbour. She managed to grow them into a full plant, it even flowered (as per pic), but she has no idea on which species of orchid it is.

I am not sure if it's a native species here (I'm in the subtropical parts of South America), but it seems to be growing just fine indoors in a Cfb climate.

Disregard the vase saying "phal azul" (blue phal), it used to belong to another orchid; it doesn't seem to be a Phalaenopsis.

If necessary I can provide further pics, but note that it has lost the flowers already.

Any idea?


EDIT: thanks to @jerry@fedia.io's comment, we could find it - it's a Miltoniopsis. Likely from Colombia or Ecuador, not from my area.

328
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics_humor@sh.itjust.works

I feel slightly offended. Because it's true.

(Alt text: "Do you feel like the answer depends on whether you're currently in the hole, versus when you refer to the events later after you get out? Assuming you get out.")

xkcd source

18

Link to the community: !isekai@ani.social

Feel free to join and talk about your favourite series. The rules are rather simple, and they're there to ensure smooth discussion.

8
submitted 9 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/tiodopave

Pir!

10
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

I'm sharing this mostly as a historical curiosity; Schleicher was genial, but the book is a century and half old, science marches on, so it isn't exactly good source material. Still an enjoyable read if you like Historical Linguistics, as it was one of the first successful attempts to reconstruct a language based on indirect output from its child languages.

37
submitted 9 months ago by lvxferre@mander.xyz to c/linguistics@mander.xyz

Link for the Science research article. The observation that societies without access to softer food kind of avoided labiodentals is old, from 1985, but the research is recent-ish (2019).

view more: next ›

lvxferre

joined 9 months ago
MODERATOR OF