🗿
merthyr1831
cool info!
even then he was too nice. Multiple times he was called sexist or straight up libelled - remember when Hilary or Warren claimed he said a woman would lose to trump or some other shit? Like he just let that slide
Democrats are fundraising already it seems
The difference is Lammy doesn't need to pretend to be progressive now he's secured the gravy train. he'll be a good little lapdog for the Americans, just like Keir who dreams of repeating his idol's crowning achievement: following a fascist into the gauntlet of a Middle Eastern war
I've taken to calling it LiGMA/GIMP myself.
forcing women to sexually please men to make them more liberal is a very normal liberal take
This post is devoid of dialectics.
This isn't a one-way "Anarchists learn to hate state communists" relationship, but state communists also learn to hate Anarchists. Their rivalry and history fuels the distrust in one-another.
History has more than enough examples of Anarchists being fucked up by state communists, and conversely many examples of Anarchists rebelling against state communists. In turn, both are distrusting and crack down on support for the other.
If you truly want to engage with anarchists in a constructive fashion, and appreciate the political history of anarchism properly, you have to drop this idea that one side "started it" or one side is "taught" to hate the other. It's clear from this post that you're already arguing from the perspective that one side is irrationally attacking the other, despite doing that yourself.
There is value and important knowledge from most if not all socialist ideologies, and if anything the synthesis of movements is exactly how history is moved forward and how we impose a new order of resistance against the capitalist class.
"Hezbollah Defeated" motherfucker they were launching missiles from within 1km of the border today. hilarious cope from the IOF.