228
A modern paper
(fedia.io)
It feels ridiculous to see a 5-page paper with a 150-page appendix. Makes you question what is the paper.
Alpha scientist on an SUV: just push it out
Economics: How much are you willing to pay?
Smarter you in a few years ;)
I’m with you on that. My comment was more like sometimes the appendices seem to get out of hand. They probably contain entire papers there.
No need to rush to conclusions, I do read appendices when needed. My point is not that authors should cut the appendices or compromise on any other good open science practices. The point is that disproportionately large appendices make one wonder if some of that stuff actually belongs in the main text. If it is just a robustness check that gives a similar result, fine, make a footnote in the main text and put the analysis in the appendix. But what if it is actually relevant information that changes the perception of the main text?
Thanks for the insight!
Yes, just checked)
Why did they replace bash with zsh?
The bladder tells the balls that it's time
I mean, it is kind of hard to push the stuff through initially when the thing is hard. But I guess you're right that aiming becomes a bigger issue.
681
Markets will surely do
(lemmy.world)
A bit a of a straw man here, I know. Inspired by the recent debates about the commercial use of space and how it makes scientists worried about pollution and environmental degradation
view more: next ›
nodimetotie
joined 1 year ago
Or the only person who phrases your issue this way) so many times I’ve found out that I just state my problem in an unusual way