[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Liberals are the right, silly 😂

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I wasn't aware of this, but it's sort of irrelevant considering it hasn't been for a very long time.

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

It's an inconvenient truth for sure. I'm using sync right now because it's the best app experience on android at the moment if you don't need to top level post and because I used it with Reddit. This wasn't a big deal with Reddit imo, but using a closed source app to access an open source platform feels wrong.

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago

It makes you wonder who's actually pulling the strings of dotworld. The instance owners have the same pro-corporate, pro-capitalist, anti-leftist, anti-communist stance as Reddit. 🤔

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you for posting this well sourced reply. I'm sorry that you're being downvoted. Libs have an aneurysm anytime someone challenges their current world view. Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is on my to read least and I may just have to start reading it tonight.

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

I just checked. Pitch Black is the highest with 59%. I like all of those movies too 😭

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Well comrades. The jig is up. Might as well shut this place down. We'll never overcome hUmAn NaTuRe 😨😩

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago

Welcome to capitalism. Where the rules are made up and everything is an advertisement.

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I can also do a search for "building collapse" and cherrypick articles that appear to support my claim, but random individual instances do not prove a systemic issue. The part of the article that you quoted is an unsubstantiated claim without any backing evidence or sources.

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Okay, but you're missing the point. The argument that @C4RCOSA@lemmygrad.ml makes is in the first line of their first post in this thread.

Russia is not on the verge of collapse

Nothing you've stated does anything to disprove the evidence presented nor does it disprove the statement made in isolation of any evidence.

Edit: I suppose it was naive of me to assume that any of you reactionaries would have bothered to actually read the content that you're supposedly refuting. Your dogmatism is clearly on display here.

[-] o_d@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago

Believing Chinese fairytales and demand sources.

This isn't an argument. Thank you for proving my point.

You people are amazing.

Aaawwweee! Thaaaanks! ☺️

view more: next ›

o_d

joined 1 year ago