394
submitted 9 months ago by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/aww@lemmy.world
[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Picture #7 is peak. Trolleys and wagons, but no cars.

Peak.

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Toronto : Eglington.. Oh wait.

5
submitted 10 months ago by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/fuckcars@lemmy.ca

Hi everybody.

I'm sorry if my question is really weirdly specific. It's something I've been thinking about for a long time.

You ever see those movies, where people live in this techno-future dystopia, skyscrapers and traffic clogged freeways, car - centric urban planning with no greenery, no trees, think of like Times Square NYC, hyper capitalist neolib dystopia kind of thing.

You see in those movies, the main character (a socially detached loner) depressed, part of the reason is not just a horribly atomized and superficial Society, but the other reason is the wretched urban planning and brutalist architecture.

I think there's been a few articles already on the importance of good architecture for creating a more "communal" mental effect for the people in the town.

I'm wondering if you guys found any articles or essays on the importance of specifically good urban planning (I already read about architecture). Stuff about how car centric urban planning atomizes the individual, ruins the social fabric, ruins the communal mentality, etc.. Sociological stuff.

If you do, please comment. I'd love to read.

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago
[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

Every provincial and state DOT in North America has this 1950s sprawl / freeway ideology so deeply embedded. It's crazy. They don't accept any new statistics or science.

Even in California and BC (both progressive governments currently) nobody has talked about the regressive DOTs.

We don't notice, because regressive urban planning is considered normal in North America. We're basically brainwashed by thinking its normal from a young age.

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not actually Степан, I just like the cat

-1
submitted 10 months ago by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/aww@lemmy.world
[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

I'm not actually Степан, I just like the cat

-8
submitted 10 months ago by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/cat@lemmy.world
[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 months ago

Warren Farrell and Scott Galloway went into this

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

This is a little stupid and almost a safety hazard because of the confusion it causes.

There are tried and tested ways of traffic calming, this one isn't that smart.

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 months ago

More renewable energy , less fossil fuels

More density, less sprawl

More transit, less cars

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

I still don't understand why not USA / Canada, where cars are very common

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Damn. I think they should still give food, but yeah he should gtfo.

[-] stepan@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

We need to get off fossil fuels ASAP, we also should probably wean away from car centricity, it's making us dependent on these oil cartels. They have an oligopoly and they can just yank the prices up if they want and screw over everybody else.

32
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/mensliberation@lemmy.ca

The gist of it: with each passing decade there's a growing shortage of construction laborers, resulting in large wait times for housing to be built. Some analysts wonder why the key demographic isn't showing up.

I've seen a few articles in the past few years about young men supposedly checking out of society and work, I wonder if there is a connection between that and this article here because young men tend to be the prime demographic for working this job.

Companies need to pay their workers better.

69
Shaded Walkability Planning (www.planetizen.com)
submitted 1 year ago by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml

Todd Litman from the Victoria Transport Policy Institute (Canada) discusses some methods for creating shaded pathways to protect pedestrians from excess heat.

10
submitted 1 year ago by stepan@lemmy.ca to c/fuckcars@lemmy.ca

I'm in Toronto Canada and it's a very car dependent landscape unfortunately and honestly I'm a little jealous seeing European places and how nice they are with their rich history. Meanwhile here in Ontario we have quadruple-carriageways and stroads lined with strip malls and big-box stores with their expansive parking lots. Unless you're with friends, going outside can be pretty bleak to the eye.

My ideal town would be as such

  1. a car-free and dense downtown area with rowhouses and condo units above cafes and shops

  2. lots of trees and greenery

  3. traditional architectural design

What would you think for yours?

view more: next ›

stepan

joined 1 year ago