[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 5 months ago

anytime hug

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 8 months ago

Linus Tech Tips

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Bandwidth exceeded ๐Ÿ˜”

Edit: Yoo, it's back!

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 9 months ago

I unironically love it jjhfsawruincx

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

I'm in this picture and I don't like it ๐Ÿ˜”

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

Human blobfish

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 10 months ago

What a cute girl :3

[-] swizzle9144@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks a lot! This clarifies it for me, and if I understand correctly, it shouldn't be a concern for me since my laptop isn't used for data-intensive computing.

41

I'm shopping for a new NVMe SSD drive for my laptop and with the second deciding factor being Linux compatibility, I'd looked up the names of specific drives in the source code of Linux and discovered that their controllers have quirks that have to be worked around.

Now, I figured out more or less how quirks affecting one of the controllers impact its functionality under Linux, but there's another controller that I have a trouble understanding how disabling the aforementioned command limits the functionality of, if at all; therefore I'd like to ask you all, under what circumstances is the command used by a host and can disabling it lower the performance or power efficiency of an impacted controller/drive?

To be clear, the quirk workaround I'm talking a about is NVME_QUIRK_DISABLE_WRITE_ZEROES.

view more: next โ€บ

swizzle9144

joined 1 year ago