So it says that instead of doubling capacity, which we did, we should have tripled capacity, when instead we developed more solar, because it was cheaper, and therefore more to efficienct. Personally, I'm glad to see we doubled wind capacity, and spent money more efficiently on solar. I don't understand why everything has to be framed as a negative. I think I used too many commas in that first sentence but I'm sticking with it. Honestly, you guys are lucky I'm proofreading at all.
thegr8goldfish
joined 1 year ago
US, India, Russia, Japan are building out wind power much too slowly for climate change, report says
If they get a tax cut then every citizen should be entitled to one free download. Honestly they're lucky we don't put it in the public domain after pulling that bullshit.
I tend to think that once the media calls each state on election night, it becomes very difficult to move forward with contested results UNLESS it comes down to a single state again. If it's a toss up, they'll flex but if it takes flipping multiple states I think the Supreme Clowns will probably take the L.
Bro, I voted Nader in 2000. In Florida. I still love Nader but I sure learned that lesson.
I'm probably biased but I always assumed the only reason they tried to railroad him was because his impression was so on the money.
New owner gets taxed based on what they pay for it, so they county will end up collecting more.
Some localities limit the increase in taxable value to a fixed percentage, which can combat that. The taxable value of my home is something like 25% of the actual value.
Now do the corporations.
If he flexs his newfound immunity he could definitely stir the pot.
Weird how those guys are all in the same party.
case violates centuries of New York case law.
No worries. The Supreme Clowns of the United States have already been clear that precedent means nothing.
Maybe the code? It is ZEBES