zbyte64

If we're talking about corporations I can only assume you mean options in how to get fucked.

Replace government with billionaire and your statement is made even more true.

While "Bush" isn't specific enough

Which one is for bringing the genocide home?

RAG is a search engine that sometimes summarizes incorrectly and uses 10x the energy. Such a dumb product.

I mean at this point the most unbearable thing I can do to you is show empathy. And yeah I am too hard on myself, so maybe I recognize it when I see it.

Alternatively, Big Bird could go with the establishment definition of wage theft and mention it's the largest form of theft.

Well the important thing here is you found a way to be humble about it all. Kudos on finding a way to live your truth in a way that allows you to ignore everyone else's. I suppose that really is the opposite of virtue.

Edit: but on a serious note, I think you're already hard on yourself and maybe we should let up. I think in a way you're instigating this to get attention, which I am not bothered by, I just want to point out that there's a need here that has to be fulfilled.

I don't think having a diversity in viewpoints on whether kids have rights is something to celebrate.

Writing on it on Lemmy isn’t ’caring about it’. It’s just virtue signalling.

It certainly isn't virtue signaling when you post 4 times to a single post talking about how you do actually care but it isn't misplaced like other people here. You're actually here changing hearts and minds one conversation at a time.

Irresponsible vs responsible is how the credit card companies frame it, but I think most of the time it's about luck. The kind of luck where the primary income gets hit by a car or someone in the family gets cancer.

It's all about individual freedom until you start asking libertarians about the rights of kids and contractual indentured servitude.